Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transitional Care of Older Adults Hospitalized with Heart Failure: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
20041.0k citationsMary D. Naylor, D Brooten et al.Journal of the American Geriatrics Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D Brooten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D Brooten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D Brooten more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D Brooten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D Brooten. The network helps show where D Brooten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D Brooten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D Brooten.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D Brooten based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D Brooten. D Brooten is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Naylor, Mary D., et al.. (2004). Transitional Care of Older Adults Hospitalized with Heart Failure: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 52(5). 675–684.1044 indexed citations breakdown →
Graven, Stanley N., Frank W. Bowen, D Brooten, et al.. (1992). The high-risk infant environment. Part 1. The role of the neonatal intensive care unit in the outcome of high-risk infants.. PubMed. 12(2). 164–72.49 indexed citations
7.
Brooten, D, et al.. (1992). Prevention of low birth weight.. PubMed. 3(1). 13–24.6 indexed citations
Termini, Lara, et al.. (1990). Reasons for acute care visits and rehospitalizations in very low-birthweight infants.. PubMed. 8(5). 23–6.21 indexed citations
10.
Gennaro, Susan, et al.. (1990). Concerns of mothers of low birthweight infants.. PubMed. 16(5). 459–62.20 indexed citations
11.
Brooten, D, et al.. (1989). Developing a program grant for use in model testing.. PubMed. 10(6). 314–8.4 indexed citations
12.
Brown, Linda P., et al.. (1989). Very low birth-weight infants: parental visiting and telephoning during initial infant hospitalization.. PubMed. 38(4). 233–6.19 indexed citations
13.
Finkler, Steven A., D Brooten, & Lisa Brown. (1988). Utilization of inpatient services under shortened lengths of stay: a neonatal care example.. PubMed. 25(2). 271–80.1 indexed citations
14.
Brooten, D, et al.. (1988). Concerns of parents of low birthweight infants following hospital discharge: a report of parent-initiated telephone calls.. PubMed. 7(2). 37–42.13 indexed citations
15.
Brooten, D, Laura L. Hayman, & Mary D. Naylor. (1988). Leadership for Change: An Action Guide for Nurses. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
16.
Roncoli, Marianne & D Brooten. (1985). Low-birthweight infants: balancing the scales of care.. PubMed. 6(4). 198–201.4 indexed citations
17.
Brooten, D. (1984). Managerial Leadership in Nursing. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.