Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology
2004570 citationsGeoffrey W. Barton, Cynthia Mitchell et al.Chemosphereprofile →
A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation
2002507 citationsGeoffrey W. Barton, Cynthia Mitchell et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Mitchell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Mitchell. The network helps show where Cynthia Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia Mitchell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia Mitchell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia Mitchell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia Mitchell. Cynthia Mitchell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mason, Norman W. H., K Ross, & Cynthia Mitchell. (2015). A case study analysis of formal and informal institutional arrangements for local scale wastewater services in Indonesia. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).1 indexed citations
10.
Mitchell, Cynthia, Joanne Chong, Andrea Turner, et al.. (2013). Darling Quarter Case Study: Successful sewage recycling within a high profile commercial building. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).3 indexed citations
11.
Mitchell, Cynthia, Joanne Chong, Andrea Turner, et al.. (2013). Saving water and spending energy?. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).1 indexed citations
12.
Mitchell, Cynthia, Joanne Chong, Andrea Turner, et al.. (2013). Matching treatment to risk. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).
13.
Mitchell, Cynthia, et al.. (2013). Aurora case study: Pioneering sewage recycling in a greenfield residential development provides many lessons. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).1 indexed citations
14.
Mukheibir, Pierre, et al.. (2012). Adaptive planning for resilient urban water systems under an uncertain future. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).7 indexed citations
Barton, Geoffrey W., et al.. (2004). The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology. Chemosphere. 59(3). 355–367.570 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Mitchell, Cynthia, et al.. (1998). On the Way to Reflexivity. 295.2 indexed citations
Mitchell, Cynthia. (1973). Time for school : a practical guide for parents of young children.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.