C.‐W. Schellhammer
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
- Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles
- Click Chemistry and Applications
-
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Papers in
-
- Synthesis and biological activity 3
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics 2
- Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives 1
- Click Chemistry and Applications 1
- Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 1
- Co-authors
- Joseph D. SchroederSteffen E. PetersenSiegfried PetersenHermann StetterGerhard DomagkJeremy W. SchroederH. HelmV. Schyja
- Journals
- Die Naturwissenschaften (2 papers)Laser and Particle Beams (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Chemische Berichte (1 paper)Justus Liebig s Annalen der Chemie (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
C.‐W. Schellhammer
11 papers receiving 355 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Organic Chemistry 252
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 57
- Toxicology 20
- Spectroscopy 61
- Bioengineering 12
Countries citing papers authored by C.‐W. Schellhammer
This map shows the geographic impact of C.‐W. Schellhammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.‐W. Schellhammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.‐W. Schellhammer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.‐W. Schellhammer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.‐W. Schellhammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.‐W. Schellhammer. The network helps show where C.‐W. Schellhammer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside C.‐W. Schellhammer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1975 | 38 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 168 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 80 | |
| 7 | 1959 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1959 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1959 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1957 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1957 | 7 |
About C.‐W. Schellhammer
C.‐W. Schellhammer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Clinical Biochemistry, Polymers and Plastics, Inorganic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (2 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (2 papers), Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives (1 paper), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (252 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (57 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Spectroscopy (61 citations) and Bioengineering (12 citations). C.‐W. Schellhammer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph D. Schroeder, Steffen E. Petersen, Siegfried Petersen, Hermann Stetter, Gerhard Domagk, Jeremy W. Schroeder, H. Helm, V. Schyja and Andreas H. Hielscher. Their work appears in journals such as Die Naturwissenschaften, Laser and Particle Beams, Tetrahedron, Chemische Berichte and Justus Liebig s Annalen der Chemie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.