C.‐W. Schellhammer

427 total citations
11 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

C.‐W. Schellhammer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Polymers and Plastics. According to data from OpenAlex, C.‐W. Schellhammer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organic Chemistry, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Polymers and Plastics. Recurrent topics in C.‐W. Schellhammer's work include Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers). C.‐W. Schellhammer is often cited by papers focused on Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers). C.‐W. Schellhammer collaborates with scholars based in Germany. C.‐W. Schellhammer's co-authors include Joseph D. Schroeder, Steffen E. Petersen, Siegfried Petersen, Hermann Stetter, Gerhard Domagk, Jeremy W. Schroeder, V. Schyja, Andreas H. Hielscher and H. Helm and has published in prestigious journals such as Tetrahedron, Die Naturwissenschaften and Chemische Berichte.

In The Last Decade

C.‐W. Schellhammer

11 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C.‐W. Schellhammer Germany	8	252	78	61	57	54	11	367
G. W. H. Cheeseman United Kingdom	15	524 2.1×	63 0.8×	54 0.9×	61 1.1×	101 1.9×	62	636
Edward Carberry United States	10	312 1.2×	125 1.6×	39 0.6×	52 0.9×	20 0.4×	15	433
Gianlorenzo Marino Italy	13	352 1.4×	51 0.7×	77 1.3×	58 1.0×	39 0.7×	39	464
Burkhard Knieriem Germany	11	304 1.2×	82 1.1×	59 1.0×	42 0.7×	46 0.9×	22	408
Z. YOSHIDA Japan	14	298 1.2×	80 1.0×	51 0.8×	42 0.7×	46 0.9×	34	439
LW Deady Australia	11	335 1.3×	28 0.4×	53 0.9×	56 1.0×	101 1.9×	73	439
J. A. VAN ALLAN United States	9	278 1.1×	98 1.3×	39 0.6×	52 0.9×	27 0.5×	38	358
Alfred Taurinš Canada	12	290 1.2×	33 0.4×	39 0.6×	31 0.5×	84 1.6×	42	414
Alexander Perjéssy Slovakia	12	332 1.3×	43 0.6×	107 1.8×	64 1.1×	50 0.9×	86	450
Douglas Lloyd Belgium	10	273 1.1×	63 0.8×	32 0.5×	36 0.6×	25 0.5×	34	348

Countries citing papers authored by C.‐W. Schellhammer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.‐W. Schellhammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.‐W. Schellhammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.‐W. Schellhammer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.‐W. Schellhammer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.‐W. Schellhammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.‐W. Schellhammer. The network helps show where C.‐W. Schellhammer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.‐W. Schellhammer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.‐W. Schellhammer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.‐W. Schellhammer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.‐W. Schellhammer. C.‐W. Schellhammer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Schellhammer, C.‐W., V. Schyja, Andreas H. Hielscher, & H. Helm. (2000). Photopreparation of molecular hydrogen ions in intense laser fields. Laser and Particle Beams. 18(3). 443–448. 3 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., et al.. (1975). Heterocyclen als Bausteine neuer optischer Aufheller. Angewandte Chemie. 87(19). 693–707. 38 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., et al.. (1975). Heterocycles as Structural Units in New Optical Brighteners. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 14(10). 665–679. 168 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., et al.. (1970). Über alykylierungen von benzotriazol-derivaten. Tetrahedron. 26(2). 497–510. 10 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., et al.. (1966). Aryl-Δ2-pyrazoline als optische Aufhellungsmittel. Angewandte Chemie. 78(16). 769–774. 18 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., et al.. (1966). Aryl‐Δ²‐pyrazolines as Optical Brighteners. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 5(8). 699–704. 80 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., Steffen E. Petersen, & Gerhard Domagk. (1959). Naphthoxazolchinone als tuberkulostatisch wirksame Substanzen. Die Naturwissenschaften. 46(2). 81–82. 6 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W., et al.. (1959). Einige weitere chemotherapeutisch interassante Chinonderivate, insbesondere der Chinolinreihe. Die Naturwissenschaften. 46(2). 82–82. 7 indexed citations

Schellhammer, C.‐W. & Siegfried Petersen. (1959). Über Derivate des Chinolinchinons‐(5.8). Justus Liebig s Annalen der Chemie. 624(1). 108–119. 19 indexed citations

10.

Stetter, Hermann & C.‐W. Schellhammer. (1957). Zur Kenntnis Der 2.4‐Dioxo‐2.3‐Dihydro‐Pyrane und der 2.4‐Dioxo‐Tetrahydro‐Pyrane. Justus Liebig s Annalen der Chemie. 605(1). 58–65. 11 indexed citations

11.

Stetter, Hermann & C.‐W. Schellhammer. (1957). Zur Kenntnis der 4.6‐Dihydroxy‐Picolinsäure. Chemische Berichte. 90(5). 755–758. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact