Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Efficacy of Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
1993977 citationsRobert W. Hobson, David G. Weiss et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?
1984902 citationsCarl W. White, Creighton B. Wright et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Decreased Coronary Reserve
1982421 citationsMelvin L. Marcus, Donald B. Doty et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Creighton B. Wright
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Creighton B. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Creighton B. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creighton B. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Creighton B. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Creighton B. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Creighton B. Wright. The network helps show where Creighton B. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Creighton B. Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Creighton B. Wright.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Creighton B. Wright based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Creighton B. Wright. Creighton B. Wright is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wright, Creighton B., et al.. (2002). Massive Right Atrial Thrombus. New England Journal of Medicine. 347(14). e4–e4.1 indexed citations
4.
Wright, Creighton B., et al.. (2001). The advantages of the Harmonic Scalpel for the harvesting of radial arteries for coronary artery bypass.. PubMed. 4(3). 226–29; discussion 229.15 indexed citations
Hobson, Robert W., David G. Weiss, William S. Fields, et al.. (1993). Efficacy of Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 328(4). 221–227.977 indexed citations breakdown →
White, Carl W., Creighton B. Wright, Donald B. Doty, et al.. (1984). Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?. New England Journal of Medicine. 310(13). 819–824.902 indexed citations breakdown →
Wright, Creighton B.. (1978). Effects of major venous occlusion on central and peripheral hemodynamics. Clinical research. 11.1 indexed citations
18.
Wright, Creighton B., et al.. (1975). Evaluation of blood filters: dynamics of platelets and platelet aggregates.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 77(2). 235–40.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.