Craig T. Armstrong

1.0k total citations
15 papers, 824 citations indexed

About

Craig T. Armstrong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Biochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Craig T. Armstrong has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 824 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Clinical Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in Craig T. Armstrong's work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers). Craig T. Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers). Craig T. Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Czechia. Craig T. Armstrong's co-authors include J. L. Ross Anderson, Derek N. Woolfson, Thomas L. Vincent, Aimee L. Boyle, Christopher E. Dempsey, Philip E. Mason, Andrew R. Thomson, Elizabeth H. C. Bromley, Daniel W. Watkins and Jordan M. Fletcher and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Bioinformatics and Journal of Molecular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Craig T. Armstrong

15 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Craig T. Armstrong United Kingdom 14 569 125 122 69 67 15 824
Pamela A. Sontz United States 10 599 1.1× 194 1.6× 137 1.1× 35 0.5× 112 1.7× 10 890
Frank V. Cochran United States 11 402 0.7× 93 0.7× 51 0.4× 37 0.5× 107 1.6× 15 665
N. Sukumar United States 15 504 0.9× 180 1.4× 96 0.8× 40 0.6× 77 1.1× 35 827
Hiroshi Inaba Japan 16 439 0.8× 144 1.2× 200 1.6× 176 2.6× 87 1.3× 56 776
Anthony P. Duff Australia 19 694 1.2× 132 1.1× 26 0.2× 143 2.1× 44 0.7× 48 963
Daniel W. Watkins United Kingdom 16 368 0.6× 113 0.9× 27 0.2× 47 0.7× 49 0.7× 34 686
Orna Almog Israel 16 525 0.9× 238 1.9× 40 0.3× 51 0.7× 42 0.6× 37 821
Antony J. Burton United Kingdom 14 985 1.7× 199 1.6× 224 1.8× 80 1.2× 201 3.0× 19 1.2k
M.M. Thayer United States 12 1.2k 2.0× 179 1.4× 36 0.3× 44 0.6× 44 0.7× 12 1.5k
N. Amy Yewdall Netherlands 17 638 1.1× 215 1.7× 196 1.6× 53 0.8× 111 1.7× 20 996

Countries citing papers authored by Craig T. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig T. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig T. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig T. Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig T. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig T. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig T. Armstrong. The network helps show where Craig T. Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig T. Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig T. Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig T. Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig T. Armstrong. Craig T. Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Denton, Richard M., Timothy J. Pullen, Craig T. Armstrong, Kate J. Heesom, & Guy A. Rutter. (2016). Calcium-insensitive splice variants of mammalian E1 subunit of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex with tissue-specific patterns of expression. Biochemical Journal. 473(9). 1165–1178. 28 indexed citations
2.
Armstrong, Craig T., Philip E. Mason, J. L. Ross Anderson, & Christopher E. Dempsey. (2016). Arginine side chain interactions and the role of arginine as a gating charge carrier in voltage sensitive ion channels. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 21759–21759. 132 indexed citations
3.
Armstrong, James P. K., Rameen Shakur, Sally C. Dickinson, et al.. (2015). Artificial membrane-binding proteins stimulate oxygenation of stem cells during engineering of large cartilage tissue. Nature Communications. 6(1). 7405–7405. 68 indexed citations
4.
Watkins, Daniel W., Craig T. Armstrong, Jonathan Jenkins, et al.. (2015). A suite of de novo c -type cytochromes for functional oxidoreductase engineering. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 1857(5). 493–502. 15 indexed citations
5.
Armstrong, Craig T., J. L. Ross Anderson, & Richard M. Denton. (2014). Studies on the regulation of the human E1 subunit of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, including the identification of a novel calcium-binding site. Biochemical Journal. 459(2). 369–381. 30 indexed citations
6.
Dutton, P. Leslie, Goutham Kodali, Joshua A. Mancini, et al.. (2014). Toward the biogenesis of manmade oxidoreductases working in cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 1837. e9–e10. 1 indexed citations
7.
Watkins, Daniel W., Craig T. Armstrong, & J. L. Ross Anderson. (2014). De novo protein components for oxidoreductase assembly and biological integration. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 19. 90–98. 22 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, J. L. Ross, Craig T. Armstrong, Goutham Kodali, et al.. (2013). Constructing a man-made c-type cytochrome maquette in vivo: electron transfer, oxygen transport and conversion to a photoactive light harvesting maquette.. Chemical Science. 5(2). 507–514. 70 indexed citations
9.
Armstrong, Craig T., Daniel W. Watkins, & J. L. Ross Anderson. (2012). Constructing manmade enzymes for oxygen activation. Dalton Transactions. 42(9). 3136–3150. 19 indexed citations
10.
Lichtenstein, Bruce R., Tammer A. Farid, Goutham Kodali, et al.. (2012). Engineering oxidoreductases: maquette proteins designed from scratch. Biochemical Society Transactions. 40(3). 561–566. 50 indexed citations
11.
Fletcher, Jordan M., Aimee L. Boyle, Marc Bruning, et al.. (2012). A Basis Set of de Novo Coiled-Coil Peptide Oligomers for Rational Protein Design and Synthetic Biology. ACS Synthetic Biology. 1(6). 240–250. 215 indexed citations
12.
Armstrong, Craig T., et al.. (2011). SCORER 2.0: an algorithm for distinguishing parallel dimeric and trimeric coiled-coil sequences. Bioinformatics. 27(14). 1908–1914. 41 indexed citations
13.
Armstrong, Craig T., et al.. (2010). Metal binding to a zinc-finger peptide: a comparison between solution and the gas phase. Chemical Communications. 47(1). 412–414. 27 indexed citations
14.
Rackham, Owen J. L., Martin Madera, Craig T. Armstrong, et al.. (2010). The Evolution and Structure Prediction of Coiled Coils across All Genomes. Journal of Molecular Biology. 403(3). 480–493. 77 indexed citations
15.
Armstrong, Craig T., Aimee L. Boyle, Elizabeth H. C. Bromley, et al.. (2009). Rational design of peptide-based building blocks for nanoscience and synthetic biology. Faraday Discussions. 143. 305–305. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026