Craig Pryor

4.0k total citations
72 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Craig Pryor is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Craig Pryor has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 31 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 25 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Craig Pryor's work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (56 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (32 papers) and Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (13 papers). Craig Pryor is often cited by papers focused on Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (56 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (32 papers) and Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (13 papers). Craig Pryor collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Craig Pryor's co-authors include Mats‐Erik Pistol, Michael E. Flatté, Amrit De, Lars Samuelson, Mark S. Miller, J. Kim, Andrew Williamson, Alex Zunger, L. Landín and M.-E. Pistol and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Nano Letters.

In The Last Decade

Craig Pryor

68 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Craig Pryor United States	28	2.7k	1.6k	1.2k	777	582	72	3.2k
Nobuyuki Koguchi Japan	34	3.3k 1.2×	2.3k 1.4×	1.8k 1.5×	715 0.9×	269 0.5×	134	3.9k
Udo W. Pohl Germany	27	2.3k 0.8×	2.0k 1.3×	1.4k 1.2×	354 0.5×	396 0.7×	173	3.0k
G. Karczewski Poland	33	3.0k 1.1×	1.7k 1.1×	1.9k 1.6×	418 0.5×	576 1.0×	372	3.9k
K. Kheng France	21	1.8k 0.7×	1.1k 0.7×	1.1k 0.9×	446 0.6×	234 0.4×	77	2.2k
J. H. Wolter Netherlands	31	2.6k 0.9×	1.8k 1.1×	834 0.7×	362 0.5×	482 0.8×	187	3.0k
K. W. Baldwin United States	25	2.7k 1.0×	1.5k 0.9×	783 0.6×	216 0.3×	912 1.6×	51	3.2k
P. M. Petroff United States	23	1.7k 0.6×	1.1k 0.7×	840 0.7×	231 0.3×	196 0.3×	47	2.0k
S. P. Watkins Canada	28	1.8k 0.7×	1.9k 1.2×	701 0.6×	437 0.6×	299 0.5×	152	2.5k
D. Leonard United States	23	4.7k 1.7×	3.5k 2.2×	2.2k 1.8×	574 0.7×	433 0.7×	41	5.1k
E. L. Ivchenko Russia	31	3.0k 1.1×	1.4k 0.9×	1.1k 0.9×	241 0.3×	521 0.9×	89	3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Pryor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Pryor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Pryor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Pryor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Pryor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Pryor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Pryor. The network helps show where Craig Pryor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Pryor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Pryor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Pryor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Pryor. Craig Pryor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Koenraad, P. M., et al.. (2024). Fine structure splitting cancellation in highly asymmetric InAs/InP droplet epitaxy quantum dots. Physical review. B.. 109(20). 2 indexed citations

Baustert, Kyle N., et al.. (2024). The influence of anion size on the thermoelectric properties and Seebeck coefficient inversion in PDPP-4T. MRS Communications. 14(6). 1127–1133.

Pryor, Craig, et al.. (2023). Wurtzite/zinc-blende crystal-phase GaAs heterostructures in the tight-binding approximation. Physical review. B.. 108(7).

Pryor, Craig, et al.. (2023). Empirical tight-binding parameters for wurtzite group III–V(non-nitride) and IV materials. AIP Advances. 13(2). 3 indexed citations

Skiba-Szymanska, J., et al.. (2022). Study of Size, Shape, and Etch pit formation in InAs/InP Droplet Epitaxy Quantum Dots. Nanotechnology. 33(30). 305705–305705. 6 indexed citations

Vainorius, Neimantas, et al.. (2021). Atomically sharp, crystal phase defined GaAs quantum dots. Applied Physics Letters. 119(26). 9 indexed citations

Chanier, Thomas, Craig Pryor, & Michael E. Flatté. (2012). Substitutional nickel impurities in diamond: Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum information processing. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 99(6). 67006–67006. 4 indexed citations

Koenraad, P. M., M. Bozkurt, A. Yu. Silov, et al.. (2009). Size dependent exciton g-factor in self-assembled InAs/InP quantum dots.. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 1 indexed citations

De, Amrit, Craig Pryor, & Michael E. Flatté. (2009). Electric-Field Control of a Hydrogenic Donor’s Spin in a Semiconductor. Physical Review Letters. 102(1). 17603–17603. 28 indexed citations

10.

Pistol, Mats‐Erik & Craig Pryor. (2008). Band structure of core-shell semiconductor nanowires. Physical Review B. 78(11). 79 indexed citations

11.

Seifert, W., et al.. (2007). Exciton fine structure splitting in InP quantum dots in GaInP. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 19(29). 295211–295211. 1 indexed citations

12.

De, Amrit & Craig Pryor. (2007). Calculation of Landégfactors for III-V nanowhisker quantum dots and comparison with experiment. Physical Review B. 76(15). 17 indexed citations

13.

He, Jun, Hubert J. Krenner, Craig Pryor, et al.. (2007). Growth, Structural, and Optical Properties of Self-Assembled (In,Ga)As Quantum Posts on GaAs. Nano Letters. 7(3). 802–806. 61 indexed citations

14.

Pryor, Craig & Michael E. Flatté. (2006). LandégFactors and Orbital Momentum Quenching in Semiconductor Quantum Dots. Physical Review Letters. 96(2). 26804–26804. 155 indexed citations

15.

Pryor, Craig, et al.. (2005). Land\'e $g$ factors and orbital angular momentum quenching in semiconductor quantum dots. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 1 indexed citations

16.

Pryor, Craig & Michael E. Flatté. (2003). Accuracy of Circular Polarization as a Measure of Spin Polarization in Quantum Dot Qubits. Physical Review Letters. 91(25). 257901–257901. 39 indexed citations

17.

Holm, Magnus, Mats‐Erik Pistol, & Craig Pryor. (2002). Calculations of the electronic structure of strained InAs quantum dots in InP. Journal of Applied Physics. 92(2). 932–936. 57 indexed citations

18.

Miller, Mark S., et al.. (1998). Optical Studies of Individual InAs Quantum Dots in GaAs. APS. 1 indexed citations

19.

Castrillo, P., et al.. (1997). Spectroscopy, Imaging and Switching Behaviour of Individual InP/GaInP Quantum Dots. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 36(6S). 4188–4188. 10 indexed citations

20.

Pryor, Craig. (1991). Chiral lattice fermions with correct vacuum polarization and chiral anomaly. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 43(8). 2669–2675. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact