Corrie Curtice

583 total citations
19 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

Corrie Curtice is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, Corrie Curtice has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 4 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in Corrie Curtice's work include Marine animal studies overview (15 papers), Marine and fisheries research (7 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (3 papers). Corrie Curtice is often cited by papers focused on Marine animal studies overview (15 papers), Marine and fisheries research (7 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (3 papers). Corrie Curtice collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Corrie Curtice's co-authors include Patrick N. Halpin, Megan C. Ferguson, Sofie M. Van Parijs, David W. Johnston, Andrew J. Read, Ari S. Friedlaender, Milani Chaloupka, P. Dalzell, Eric Gilman and Monica DeAngelis and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, BioScience and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Corrie Curtice

18 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Corrie Curtice United States 9 279 122 115 95 42 19 316
Anne‐Cécile Dragon France 10 299 1.1× 158 1.3× 160 1.4× 115 1.2× 36 0.9× 14 411
S.C.V. Geelhoed Netherlands 8 198 0.7× 96 0.8× 72 0.6× 49 0.5× 21 0.5× 37 257
Monica DeAngelis United States 5 366 1.3× 152 1.2× 147 1.3× 86 0.9× 57 1.4× 7 416
Gwenith S. Penry South Africa 8 225 0.8× 71 0.6× 88 0.8× 68 0.7× 23 0.5× 13 269
Sarah J. Dolman United Kingdom 9 279 1.0× 64 0.5× 128 1.1× 53 0.6× 25 0.6× 19 314
Kelly Macleod United Kingdom 7 266 1.0× 120 1.0× 84 0.7× 60 0.6× 24 0.6× 15 277
MW Brown United States 8 392 1.4× 169 1.4× 213 1.9× 200 2.1× 28 0.7× 8 439
Laura Gerrish United Kingdom 7 289 1.0× 164 1.3× 134 1.2× 116 1.2× 60 1.4× 12 430
Trevor Joyce United States 10 330 1.2× 187 1.5× 195 1.7× 128 1.3× 42 1.0× 20 449
Jason How Australia 11 382 1.4× 232 1.9× 145 1.3× 40 0.4× 123 2.9× 32 451

Countries citing papers authored by Corrie Curtice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corrie Curtice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corrie Curtice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corrie Curtice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corrie Curtice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corrie Curtice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corrie Curtice. The network helps show where Corrie Curtice may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Corrie Curtice

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Corrie Curtice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Corrie Curtice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Corrie Curtice. Corrie Curtice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Fujioka, Ei, Corrie Curtice, Ben Donnelly, et al.. (2025). Marine megavertebrate migrations connect the global ocean. Nature Communications. 16(1). 4089–4089.
2.
Ferguson, Megan C., Leslie New, Jesse Cleary, et al.. (2023). Biologically Important Areas II for cetaceans within U.S. and adjacent waters - Updates and the application of a new scoring system. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10. 4 indexed citations
3.
Kot, Connie Y., Autumn‐Lynn Harrison, Jesse Cleary, et al.. (2023). Synthesizing connectivity information from migratory marine species for area-based management. Biological Conservation. 283. 110142–110142. 8 indexed citations
4.
Friedlaender, Ari S., David W. Johnston, Reny B. Tyson, et al.. (2016). Multiple-stage decisions in a marine central-place forager. Royal Society Open Science. 3(5). 160043–160043. 45 indexed citations
5.
Johnston, David W., et al.. (2016). Prey density and depth affect the fine-scale foraging behavior of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in Sitka Sound, Alaska, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 561. 245–260. 26 indexed citations
6.
Curtice, Corrie, et al.. (2016). Marine-life Data Analysis Team (MDAT) Technical Report on the Methods and Development of Marine-life Data to Support Regional Ocean Planning and Management. 1 indexed citations
7.
Curtice, Corrie, David W. Johnston, Hugh W. Ducklow, et al.. (2015). Modeling the spatial and temporal dynamics of foraging movements of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Movement Ecology. 3(1). 13–13. 40 indexed citations
8.
Ferguson, Megan C., et al.. (2015). 7. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – Aleutian Islands and Bering Sea Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 79–93. 7 indexed citations
9.
Calambokidis, John, Gretchen H. Steiger, Corrie Curtice, et al.. (2015). 4. Biologically Important Areas for Selected Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – West Coast Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 39–53. 66 indexed citations
10.
Curtice, Corrie, et al.. (2015). 3. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – Gulf of Mexico Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 30–38. 6 indexed citations
11.
Ferguson, Megan C., et al.. (2015). 1. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – Overview and Rationale. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 2–16. 10 indexed citations
12.
Clarke, Janet T., et al.. (2015). 8. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – Arctic Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 94–103. 8 indexed citations
13.
Curtice, Corrie, et al.. (2015). 2. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – East Coast Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 17–29. 9 indexed citations
14.
Baird, Robin W., Danielle Cholewiak, Daniel L. Webster, et al.. (2015). 5. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – Hawai‘i Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 54–64. 6 indexed citations
15.
Ferguson, Megan C., et al.. (2015). 6. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – Gulf of Alaska Region. Aquatic Mammals. 41(1). 65–78. 5 indexed citations
16.
Cleary, Jesse, et al.. (2013). Data to inform the CBD North Pacific regional workshop to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas. 1 indexed citations
17.
Gilman, Eric, et al.. (2012). Hawaii longline tuna fishery temporal trends in standardized catch rates and length distributions and effects on pelagic and seamount ecosystems. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 22(4). 446–488. 55 indexed citations
18.
Curtice, Corrie, et al.. (2012). Why Ecosystem-Based Management May Fail without Changes to Tool Development and Financing. BioScience. 62(5). 508–515. 14 indexed citations
19.
Curtice, Corrie. (2011). Home Range Analysis of Hawaiian Monk Seals (Monachus schauinslandi) Based on Colony, Age, and Sex. Aquatic Mammals. 37(3). 360–371. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026