Cora A. Fanning

578 total citations
18 papers, 204 citations indexed

About

Cora A. Fanning is a scholar working on Surgery, Rheumatology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cora A. Fanning has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 204 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Rheumatology and 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Cora A. Fanning's work include Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (9 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers). Cora A. Fanning is often cited by papers focused on Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (9 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers). Cora A. Fanning collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Nepal. Cora A. Fanning's co-authors include Thomas F. Baskett, David C. Young, Scott A. Farrell, Tina Delaney, Donna Gilmour, Gordon Flowerdew, Matthias H. Schmidt, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, B. Anthony Armson and Steven J. MacDonald and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Cora A. Fanning

16 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cora A. Fanning Canada 7 105 104 70 54 49 18 204
Aethele Khunda United Kingdom 7 89 0.8× 73 0.7× 55 0.8× 26 0.5× 23 0.5× 27 193
Wilbert Spaans Netherlands 8 141 1.3× 102 1.0× 71 1.0× 94 1.7× 31 0.6× 16 252
EJ Adams United States 3 298 2.8× 247 2.4× 128 1.8× 27 0.5× 79 1.6× 9 345
Joydev Mukherji India 9 42 0.4× 36 0.3× 138 2.0× 102 1.9× 50 1.0× 15 231
Gourisankar Kamilya India 10 46 0.4× 38 0.4× 154 2.2× 117 2.2× 43 0.9× 16 247
Asha Oumachigui India 11 33 0.3× 98 0.9× 111 1.6× 114 2.1× 52 1.1× 22 278
Islam Junaid United Kingdom 10 39 0.4× 79 0.8× 60 0.9× 65 1.2× 23 0.5× 29 301
Aldo Vacca Australia 9 86 0.8× 70 0.7× 230 3.3× 150 2.8× 64 1.3× 12 326
DG Tincello United Kingdom 10 243 2.3× 177 1.7× 39 0.6× 39 0.7× 33 0.7× 18 350
Kenneth Björklund Sweden 12 46 0.4× 204 2.0× 92 1.3× 64 1.2× 296 6.0× 16 399

Countries citing papers authored by Cora A. Fanning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cora A. Fanning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cora A. Fanning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cora A. Fanning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cora A. Fanning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cora A. Fanning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cora A. Fanning. The network helps show where Cora A. Fanning may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cora A. Fanning

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cora A. Fanning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cora A. Fanning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cora A. Fanning. Cora A. Fanning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Young, David C., Tina Delaney, B. Anthony Armson, & Cora A. Fanning. (2020). Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 15(1). e0227245–e0227245. 23 indexed citations
2.
Simkhada, Padam, et al.. (2015). Why Are So Many Nepali Women Killing Themselves? A Review Of Key Issues. 1(4). 43–49. 6 indexed citations
3.
Farrell, Scott A., Gordon Flowerdew, Donna Gilmour, et al.. (2013). Overlapping Compared With End-to-End Repair of Complete Third-Degree or Fourth-Degree Obstetric Tears. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 68(1). 26–27. 1 indexed citations
4.
Farrell, Scott A., Alfred E. Bent, David Rittenberg, et al.. (2012). Women’s ability to assess their urinary incontinence type using the QUID as an educational tool. International Urogynecology Journal. 24(5). 759–762. 18 indexed citations
5.
Baskett, Thomas F., et al.. (2012). Neonatal Outcome Following Failed Kiwi OmniCup Vacuum Extraction. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 34(7). 620–625. 6 indexed citations
6.
Farrell, Scott A., Gordon Flowerdew, Donna Gilmour, et al.. (2012). Overlapping Compared With End-to-End Repair of Complete Third-Degree or Fourth-Degree Obstetric Tears. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 120(4). 803–808. 31 indexed citations
7.
Farrell, Scott A., Donna Gilmour, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, et al.. (2011). Randomized trial of overlapping versus end-to-end repair of third or fourth degree EAS tears: three year follow-up of anal incontinence symptoms.. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 1 indexed citations
8.
Farrell, Scott A., Donna Gilmour, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, et al.. (2011). Overlapping Compared With End-to-End Repair of Third- and Fourth-Degree Obstetric Anal Sphincter Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 117(2). 408–409.
9.
Farrell, Scott A., Donna Gilmour, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, et al.. (2011). Overlapping Compared With End-to-End Repair of Third- and Fourth-Degree Obstetric Anal Sphincter Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 117(2). 409–410.
10.
Farrell, Scott A., Donna Gilmour, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, et al.. (2010). Overlapping Compared With End-to-End Repair of Third- and Fourth-Degree Obstetric Anal Sphincter Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 116(5). 1223–1223. 3 indexed citations
11.
Farrell, Scott A., Donna Gilmour, Geoffrey K. Turnbull, et al.. (2010). Overlapping Compared With End-to-End Repair of Third- and Fourth-Degree Obstetric Anal Sphincter Tears. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 116(1). 16–24. 19 indexed citations
12.
Baskett, Thomas F., Cora A. Fanning, & David C. Young. (2008). A Prospective Observational Study of 1000 Vacuum Assisted Deliveries With the OmniCup Device. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 30(7). 573–580. 34 indexed citations
13.
Farrell, Scott A., et al.. (2007). Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 196(5). 474.e1–474.e8. 27 indexed citations
14.
Young, David C., et al.. (2001). 440 Lower dose vaginal and oral misoprostol in labor induction—RCT. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 185(6). S203–S203. 4 indexed citations
15.
Delaney, Tina, Joan Crane, Donna Hutchens, Cora A. Fanning, & David C. Young. (2001). 438 Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol: A comparison of dosing intervals. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 185(6). S202–S202. 2 indexed citations
16.
Delaney, Tina, Joan Crane, Donna Hutchens, Cora A. Fanning, & David C. Young. (2001). 437 Oral misoprostol labor induction in patients with a favorable cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 185(6). S202–S202. 3 indexed citations
17.
Fanning, Cora A., et al.. (1995). Postdischarge surgical site infection surveillance.. PubMed. 10(3). 75–9. 25 indexed citations
18.
Fanning, Cora A., et al.. (1991). Urinary tract infections--a survey.. PubMed. 6(3). 68–73. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026