Constance Smith‐Hicks

2.2k citations
31 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Constance Smith‐Hicks

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Constance Smith‐Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Developmental Neuroscience 102
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 413
  • Genetics 411
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 275
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
Replace Congyi Lu with:
Congyi Lu United States
Shuang Hao United States
Tzyy‐Nan Huang Taiwan
Giovanni Provenzano Italy
Theron A. Russell United States
Won Mah South Korea
Jessica L. Saulnier United States
Natsuko Kumamoto Japan
Candace Castagna United States
Marc P. Forrest United States
Constance Smith‐Hicks relative to Congyi Lu United States Congyi Lu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Congyi Lu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Smith‐Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Smith‐Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Smith‐Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Smith‐Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Smith‐Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Smith‐Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Smith‐Hicks. The network helps show where Constance Smith‐Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance Smith‐Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Smith‐Hicks Line = papers co-authored together Constance Smith‐Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008427
2 2011166
3 2000115
4 201053
5 200753
6 201737
7 201837
8 201935
9 201724
10 202123
11 202121
12 201019
13 201318
14 202116
15 201815
16 201914
17 201812
18 202010
19 20237
20 20236

About Constance Smith‐Hicks

Constance Smith‐Hicks is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cell Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (19 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (102 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (413 citations), Genetics (411 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (275 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (25 citations). Constance Smith‐Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Worley, Dietmar Kuhl, Richard L. Huganir, David J. Linden, Jason D. Shepherd, Alexey G. Ryazanov, Shoaib Chowdhury, Sangmok Kim, Walter E. Kaufmann and Joo Min Park. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Neurology, Epilepsy & Behavior, Neuron, Sleep Medicine and Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact