Cong Fu

556 citations
21 papers · 476 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Fu

19 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Cong Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 214
  • Orthodontics 33
  • Materials Chemistry 294
  • Biomedical Engineering 169
  • Catalysis 24
Replace Mahwish Bashir with:
Mahwish Bashir Pakistan
Tinglan Wang China
Youxin Duan China
Eddy S. Pino Brazil
Anna Pawlik Poland
Yusairie Mohd Malaysia
Ki-Ho Nam South Korea
Simona Popescu Romania
Ibrahim Mustapha Alibe Malaysia
Shing Fhan Khor Malaysia
Cong Fu relative to Mahwish Bashir Pakistan Mahwish Bashir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Mahwish Bashir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Fu. The network helps show where Cong Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Fu Line = papers co-authored together Cong Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020100
2 201674
3 201560
4 201539
5 202034
6 201232
7 201118
8 202216
9 200715
10 201515
11 202214
12 201212
13 201011
14 20109
15 20218
16 20207
17 20105
18 20254
19 20253
20 20230

About Cong Fu

Cong Fu is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Biomedical Engineering, Catalysis and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (9 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (8 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (6 papers), TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells (4 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (3 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (2 papers), Graphene research and applications (2 papers) and Ga2O3 and related materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (214 citations), Orthodontics (33 citations), Materials Chemistry (294 citations), Biomedical Engineering (169 citations) and Catalysis (24 citations). Cong Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Keith Savino, Matthew Z. Yates, Weixin Huang, Paul A. Gabrys, Yuxing Liu, Huiquan Li, Yumin Cui, Junwang Tang, Kun Qian and Fei Li. Their work appears in journals such as Crystal Growth & Design, Surface and Coatings Technology, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, Chemistry of Materials and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact