Communities is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations.
According to data from OpenAlex, Communities has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 674 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Finance, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Communities's work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (8 papers), Housing Market and Economics (5 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers). Communities is often cited by papers focused on Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (8 papers), Housing Market and Economics (5 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers). Communities collaborates with scholars based in . Communities's co-authors include Peter van den Besselaar and has published in prestigious journals such as Springer eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
In The Last Decade
Communities
51 papers
receiving
651 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Communities's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Communities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Communities more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Communities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Communities. The network helps show where Communities may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Communities
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Communities.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Communities based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Communities. Communities is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Communities. (2019). English Local Authority Green belt dataset.2 indexed citations
2.
Communities. (2016). Mineral Extraction in Great Britain.1 indexed citations
3.
Communities. (2015). Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010, Employment Score.1 indexed citations
4.
Communities. (2015). Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010, Income Score.1 indexed citations
5.
Communities. (2015). Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010, Health Score.1 indexed citations
6.
Communities. (2014). Life expectancy at birth.61 indexed citations
Communities. (2011). Sustainable Australia - sustainable communities: a sustainable population strategy for Australia.9 indexed citations
18.
Communities. (2011). Sustainable Australia - sustainable communities: an overview.3 indexed citations
19.
Communities. (2010). Land Use Change Statistics.2 indexed citations
20.
Communities & Peter van den Besselaar. (2005). Communities and technologies 2005 : proceedings of the Second Communities and Technologies Conference, Milano 2005. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.