Colette Dörr-Harim

647 total citations
24 papers, 196 citations indexed

About

Colette Dörr-Harim is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Colette Dörr-Harim has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 196 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Oncology and 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Colette Dörr-Harim's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers). Colette Dörr-Harim is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers). Colette Dörr-Harim collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Colette Dörr-Harim's co-authors include Markus K. Diener, Markus W. Büchler, Thilo Hackert, Ulla Klaiber, Thomas Brückner, Phillip Knebel, Pascal Probst, André L. Mihaljević, Oliver Strobel and Christine Fink and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British journal of surgery and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Colette Dörr-Harim

24 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Colette Dörr-Harim Germany	8	134	110	63	39	11	24	196
Carsten Klinger Germany	10	140 1.0×	113 1.0×	50 0.8×	33 0.8×	22 2.0×	28	226
Tammy Ju United States	9	111 0.8×	61 0.6×	61 1.0×	19 0.5×	36 3.3×	24	207
Marcus Fluck United States	10	239 1.8×	64 0.6×	62 1.0×	29 0.7×	21 1.9×	36	327
Niki Lijftogt Netherlands	8	163 1.2×	72 0.7×	126 2.0×	75 1.9×	11 1.0×	10	286
Wouter W. te Riele Netherlands	9	248 1.9×	120 1.1×	46 0.7×	16 0.4×	6 0.5×	17	291
Chencan Zhu United States	10	175 1.3×	34 0.3×	113 1.8×	39 1.0×	10 0.9×	26	272
M A Mohammed United Kingdom	7	71 0.5×	48 0.4×	48 0.8×	19 0.5×	11 1.0×	11	181
Steven S. Ahrendt United States	7	225 1.7×	142 1.3×	98 1.6×	23 0.6×	7 0.6×	8	305
Matthew M. Philp United States	8	148 1.1×	105 1.0×	21 0.3×	99 2.5×	4 0.4×	18	224
Anna Curell Spain	8	137 1.0×	47 0.4×	39 0.6×	11 0.3×	17 1.5×	20	181

Countries citing papers authored by Colette Dörr-Harim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colette Dörr-Harim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colette Dörr-Harim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colette Dörr-Harim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colette Dörr-Harim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colette Dörr-Harim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colette Dörr-Harim. The network helps show where Colette Dörr-Harim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colette Dörr-Harim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colette Dörr-Harim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colette Dörr-Harim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colette Dörr-Harim. Colette Dörr-Harim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Feldmann, H., et al.. (2024). Impact of virtual reality hypnosedation on perioperative pain and anxiety in port implantation under local anesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot trial (VIP Trial). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13(1). 101–101. 1 indexed citations

Klotz, Rosa, Thomas Pausch, Jörg Kaiser, et al.. (2024). ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts. HPB. 27(3). 311–317. 3 indexed citations

Dörr-Harim, Colette, et al.. (2023). Prehabilitation in an Integrative Medicine Day Clinic for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment: Single-Center Feasibility Pilot Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 12. e46765–e46765. 5 indexed citations

Müller, Sven, Dirk Weyhe, Florian Herrle, et al.. (2023). Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial). Trials. 24(1). 76–76. 2 indexed citations

Feldmann, H., et al.. (2023). Use of virtual reality in port implantation to reduce perioperative anxiety and pain: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial at a single German university hospital (VIP-trial; DRKS00028508). BMJ Open. 13(9). e074738–e074738. 3 indexed citations

Heger, Patrick, Thilo Hackert, Markus K. Diener, et al.. (2023). Conventional partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus an extended pancreatoduodenectomy (triangle operation) for pancreatic head cancers—study protocol for the randomised controlled TRIANGLE trial. Trials. 24(1). 363–363. 5 indexed citations

Mihaljević, André L., Colette Dörr-Harim, Eva Kalkum, & Guido Strunk. (2022). Measuring patient centeredness with German language Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) – a systematic review and qualitative analysis according to COSMIN. medRxiv. 1 indexed citations

Fink, Matthias A., Manuel Feißt, Christoph Eckert, et al.. (2022). Protocol of a prospective study investigating the association of PAncreatic parenchymal RISk factors with postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PARIS trial). BMJ Open. 12(4). e054138–e054138. 2 indexed citations

Klotz, Rosa, Colette Dörr-Harim, Thomas Brückner, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy—study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial (EUROPA, DRKS00020407). Trials. 22(1). 40–40. 14 indexed citations

10.

Probst, Pascal, Colette Dörr-Harim, Anja Sander, et al.. (2021). Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial). BMJ Open. 11(2). e047867–e047867. 7 indexed citations

11.

Hüttner, Felix J., Pascal Probst, André L. Mihaljević, et al.. (2020). Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 10(10). e038930–e038930. 6 indexed citations

12.

Studier‐Fischer, Alexander, Thomas Tu, Mirco Friedrich, et al.. (2020). Postoperative complications and mobilisation following major abdominal surgery with vs. without fitness tracker-based feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): study protocol for a student-led multicentre randomised controlled trial (CHIR-Net SIGMA study group). Trials. 21(1). 293–293. 9 indexed citations

13.

Heger, Patrick, Manuel Feißt, Johannes Krisam, et al.. (2019). Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 20(1). 738–738. 9 indexed citations

14.

Klaiber, Ulla, Thomas Brückner, Christine Fink, et al.. (2018). Impact of preoperative patient education on the prevention of postoperative complications after major visceral surgery: the cluster randomized controlled PEDUCAT trial. Trials. 19(1). 288–288. 31 indexed citations

15.

Fink, Christoph, Mirco Friedrich, Thomas Brückner, et al.. (2018). Prospective multicentre cohort study of patient-reported outcomes and complications following major abdominal neoplastic surgery (PATRONUS) – study protocol for a CHIR-Net student-initiated German medical audit study (CHIR-Net SIGMA study). BMC Surgery. 18(1). 90–90. 4 indexed citations

16.

Klotz, Rosa, Stefan Hofer, A. Schellhaaß, et al.. (2016). Intravenous versus epidural analgesia to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal complications after elective pancreatoduodenectomy (the PAKMAN trial, DRKS 00007784): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 17(1). 194–194. 10 indexed citations

17.

Probst, Pascal, Colette Dörr-Harim, Thomas Brückner, et al.. (2015). Nutritional Risk in Major Abdominal Surgery: Protocol of a Prospective Observational Trial to Evaluate the Prognostic Value of Different Nutritional Scores in Pancreatic Surgery. JMIR Research Protocols. 4(4). e132–e132. 5 indexed citations

18.

Richter, Susanne, Georgios Polychronidis, Daniel Gotthardt, et al.. (2014). Effect of delayed CNI-based immunosuppression with Advagraf® on liver function after MELD-based liver transplantation [IMUTECT]. BMC Surgery. 14(1). 64–64. 1 indexed citations

19.

Hackert, Thilo, Thomas Brückner, Colette Dörr-Harim, et al.. (2013). Pylorus resection or pylorus preservation in partial pancreatico-duodenectomy (PROPP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 14(1). 44–44. 16 indexed citations

20.

Diener, Markus K., Colette Dörr-Harim, Inga Rossion, & Markus W. Büchler. (2012). Die Nutzenbewertung von Medizinprodukten in der chirurgischen, patientenorientierten Forschung. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 106(5). 336–340. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact