Cody Parker

405 total citations
4 papers, 62 citations indexed

About

Cody Parker is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cody Parker has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Genetics, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Cody Parker's work include Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Cody Parker is often cited by papers focused on Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Cody Parker collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Cody Parker's co-authors include Kirsten I. Bos, Johannes Krause, Wolfgang Haak, Matthias Meyer, Adam B. Rohrlach, Sarah Nagel, Susanne Friederich, Philip Slavin, Alexander Herbig and Gunnar U. Neumann and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, PLoS Pathogens and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

In The Last Decade

Cody Parker

4 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers

Cody Parker
Cody Parker
Citations per year, relative to Cody Parker Cody Parker (= 1×) peers Dilek Koptekin

Countries citing papers authored by Cody Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cody Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cody Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cody Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cody Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cody Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cody Parker. The network helps show where Cody Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cody Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cody Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cody Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cody Parker. Cody Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
1.
Parker, Cody, Maria A. Spyrou, Gunnar U. Neumann, et al.. (2023). 14th century Yersinia pestis genomes support emergence of pestis secunda within Europe. PLoS Pathogens. 19(7). e1011404–e1011404. 2 indexed citations
2.
Parker, Cody, Kirsten I. Bos, Wolfgang Haak, & Johannes Krause. (2021). Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 4 indexed citations
3.
Parker, Cody, Kirsten I. Bos, Wolfgang Haak, & Johannes Krause. (2021). Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 1 indexed citations
4.
Parker, Cody, Adam B. Rohrlach, Susanne Friederich, et al.. (2020). A systematic investigation of human DNA preservation in medieval skeletons. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 18225–18225. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026