C.M. Sherwin

3.4k total citations
62 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

C.M. Sherwin is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, C.M. Sherwin has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Small Animals, 33 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 11 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in C.M. Sherwin's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (32 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (24 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (14 papers). C.M. Sherwin is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (32 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (24 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (14 papers). C.M. Sherwin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. C.M. Sherwin's co-authors include Christine J Nicol, GJ Richards, P. D. Lewis, G. C. Perry, Tracy Bhamra, C. Moinard, I. Anna S. Olsson, Joy A. Mench, Stine B. Christiansen and Claire A Weeks and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Animal Behaviour and Poultry Science.

In The Last Decade

C.M. Sherwin

62 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.M. Sherwin United Kingdom 30 1.4k 1.1k 481 378 365 62 2.6k
I. Anna S. Olsson Portugal 30 1.3k 1.0× 627 0.6× 579 1.2× 213 0.6× 412 1.1× 115 2.9k
Vera Baumans Netherlands 40 2.3k 1.7× 912 0.8× 905 1.9× 510 1.3× 898 2.5× 110 5.6k
Daniel D. Guemene France 25 960 0.7× 1.7k 1.5× 488 1.0× 234 0.6× 170 0.5× 87 2.5k
M. J. Gentle United Kingdom 30 847 0.6× 1.5k 1.3× 182 0.4× 213 0.6× 139 0.4× 70 2.4k
Heleen van de Weerd United Kingdom 23 1.8k 1.3× 1.3k 1.1× 483 1.0× 269 0.7× 414 1.1× 44 2.4k
Christine Leterrier France 31 1.5k 1.1× 2.0k 1.7× 574 1.2× 211 0.6× 334 0.9× 103 3.4k
B.M. Spruijt Netherlands 29 847 0.6× 450 0.4× 437 0.9× 253 0.7× 1.1k 3.1× 66 2.9k
I. Rozenboim Israel 32 301 0.2× 1.9k 1.7× 581 1.2× 284 0.8× 167 0.5× 99 3.3k
John J. McGlone United States 41 3.2k 2.4× 3.2k 2.8× 863 1.8× 439 1.2× 342 0.9× 162 5.3k
H. Hopster Netherlands 25 2.0k 1.5× 1.3k 1.2× 1.1k 2.2× 705 1.9× 824 2.3× 48 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by C.M. Sherwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.M. Sherwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.M. Sherwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.M. Sherwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.M. Sherwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.M. Sherwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.M. Sherwin. The network helps show where C.M. Sherwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.M. Sherwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.M. Sherwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.M. Sherwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.M. Sherwin. C.M. Sherwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Juberg, Daland R., Donald A. Fox, Patrick A. Forcelli, et al.. (2023). A perspective on In vitro developmental neurotoxicity test assay results: An expert panel review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 143. 105444–105444. 12 indexed citations
2.
Sherwin, C.M., et al.. (2013). Prevalence of nematode infection and faecal egg counts in free-range laying hens: relations to housing and husbandry. British Poultry Science. 54(1). 12–23. 68 indexed citations
3.
Sherwin, C.M., GJ Richards, & Christine J Nicol. (2010). Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. British Poultry Science. 51(4). 488–499. 168 indexed citations
4.
Ganswindt, André, et al.. (2007). A Case Study: Fecal Corticosteroid and Behavior as Indicators of Welfare During Relocation of an Asian Elephant. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 10(4). 349–358. 50 indexed citations
5.
Dewberry, Emma & C.M. Sherwin. (2002). Visioning Sustainability through Design. Greener Management International. 2002(37). 125–139. 11 indexed citations
6.
Howell, Jeff, et al.. (2002). Aerodynamic Drag of a Compact SUV as Measured On-Road and in the Wind Tunnel. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 34 indexed citations
7.
Moinard, C., P. D. Lewis, G. C. Perry, & C.M. Sherwin. (2001). The Effects of Light Intensity and Light Source on Injuries Due to Pecking of Male Domestic Turkeys (Meleagris Gallopavo). Animal Welfare. 10(2). 131–139. 26 indexed citations
8.
Hawkins, Penny, David B. Morton, Innes C. Cuthill, et al.. (2001). Laboratory birds: refinements in husbandry and procedures. Laboratory Animals. 35. 37 indexed citations
9.
Cuthill, Innes C., et al.. (2001). Behavioural and physiological effects of absence of ultraviolet wavelengths for domestic chicks. Animal Behaviour. 62(5). 1013–1019. 61 indexed citations
10.
Lewis, P. D., G. C. Perry, C.M. Sherwin, & C. Moinard. (2000). Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Performance of Intact Male Turkeys. Poultry Science. 79(6). 850–855. 19 indexed citations
11.
Sherwin, C.M., et al.. (1999). Preliminary investigations of ultraviolet-induced markings on domestic turkey chicks and a possible role in injurious pecking. British Poultry Science. 40(4). 429–433. 29 indexed citations
12.
Sherwin, C.M., P. D. Lewis, & G. C. Perry. (1999). Effects of environmental enrichment, fluorescent and intermittent lighting on injurious pecking amongst male turkey poults. British Poultry Science. 40(5). 592–598. 39 indexed citations
13.
Sherwin, C.M.. (1999). Domestic turkeys are not averse to compact fluorescent lighting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 64(1). 47–55. 18 indexed citations
14.
Sherwin, C.M., et al.. (1998). Time-budgets, comfort behaviours and injurious pecking of turkeys housed in pairs. British Poultry Science. 39(3). 325–332. 39 indexed citations
15.
Sherwin, C.M.. (1996). Preferences of Laboratory Mice for Characteristics of Soiling Sites. Animal Welfare. 5(3). 283–288. 13 indexed citations
16.
Sherwin, C.M.. (1995). Environmental Enrichment for Laying Hens - Spherical Objects in the Feed Trough. Animal Welfare. 4(1). 41–51. 15 indexed citations
17.
Weeks, Claire A, Christine J Nicol, C.M. Sherwin, & S. Kestin. (1994). Comparison of the Behaviour of Broiler Chickens in Indoor and Free-Range Environments. Animal Welfare. 3(3). 179–192. 62 indexed citations
18.
Sherwin, C.M., et al.. (1993). Effects of cage-front design on the feeding behaviour of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 38(3-4). 291–299. 2 indexed citations
19.
Sherwin, C.M.. (1993). Pecking behaviour of laying hens provided with a simple motorised environmental enrichment device. British Poultry Science. 34(2). 235–240. 13 indexed citations
20.
Sherwin, C.M., S. Kestin, Christine J Nicol, et al.. (1993). Variation in behavioural indices of fearfulness and fatigue in transported broilers. British Veterinary Journal. 149(6). 571–578. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by I. Anna S. Olsson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vera Baumans Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel D. Guemene Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. J. Gentle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heleen van de Weerd Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Leterrier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B.M. Spruijt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by I. Rozenboim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John J. McGlone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Hopster
Rankless by CCL
2026