C.M. Lim

2.2k citations
55 papers · 1.7k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

C.M. Lim

52 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

C.M. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Ophthalmology 357
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 563
  • Signal Processing 278
  • Health Information Management 114
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 501
Replace Lim Choo Min with:
Lim Choo Min Singapore
Kuang Chua Chua Singapore
C. Eswaran Malaysia
Samarendra Dandapat India
Joel E.W. Koh Singapore
Chua Kuang Chua Singapore
M. Suchetha India
Baha Şen Türkiye
Javad Haddadnia Iran
Daniel Álvarez Spain
C.M. Lim relative to Lim Choo Min Singapore Lim Choo Min's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lim Choo Min · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.M. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.M. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.M. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.M. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.M. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.M. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.M. Lim. The network helps show where C.M. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.M. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.M. Lim Line = papers co-authored together C.M. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005221
2 2007208
3 2009157
4 2010133
5 2004130
6 2012124
7 2008114
8 200285
9 199164
10 200659
11 200847
12 198542
13 200740
14 200828
15 198527
16 198923
17 198521
18 198920
19 199016
20 199614

About C.M. Lim

C.M. Lim is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Power System Optimization and Stability (24 papers), Power Systems Fault Detection (9 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Frequency Control in Power Systems (8 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (7 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (6 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (357 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (563 citations), Signal Processing (278 citations), Health Information Management (114 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (501 citations). C.M. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include U. Rajendra Acharya, Vinod Chandran, N. Kannathal, Kuang Chua Chua, Sadasivan Puthusserypady, S. Elangovan, P. Subbanna Bhat, Takashi Hiyama, E. Y. K. Ng and Jagadish Nayak. Their work appears in journals such as Electric Power Systems Research, Mechatronics, Journal of Medical Systems, Computers & Education and Computers in Industry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact