Clinton D. Chapman
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nancy K. DessSherrel G. HowardJohn GarcíaJeffrey J. RaizerRussell A. GazzaraW. S. AmmonsThomas R. MinorDerek C. Monroe
- Topics
- Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (12 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (10 papers)Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSweden
In The Last Decade
Clinton D. Chapman
27 papers receiving 462 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 178
- Nutrition and Dietetics 150
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 132
- Sensory Systems 110
- Behavioral Neuroscience 106
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton D. Chapman
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton D. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton D. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton D. Chapman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton D. Chapman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton D. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton D. Chapman. The network helps show where Clinton D. Chapman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton D. Chapman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton D. Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton D. Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton D. Chapman. Clinton D. Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Clinton D. Chapman
Clinton D. Chapman is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (12 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (10 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (106 citations), Sensory Systems (110 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (132 citations). Clinton D. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Nancy K. Dess, Sherrel G. Howard, John García, Jeffrey J. Raizer, Russell A. Gazzara, W. S. Ammons, Thomas R. Minor, Derek C. Monroe, Dennis A. Vanderweele and Kenneth F. Green. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurophysiology and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.