Clévia Rosset
Impact in
-
- Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
- Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments
-
- Tumors and Oncological Cases
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Papers in
- Oncology 7
- Co-authors
- Patrícia Ashton‐Prolla (19 shared papers)Cristina Brinckmann Oliveira Netto (6 shared papers)Alexandre Prehn Zavascki (1 shared paper)Fernanda de Paris (2 shared papers)Maria Isabel Achatz (2 shared papers)Afonso Luís Barth (1 shared paper)Priscila Lamb Wink (1 shared paper)Andreza Francisco Martins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Haemophilia (2 papers)Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis (2 papers)Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Gene (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Clévia Rosset
24 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Physiology 98
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
- Oncology 58
- Neurology 26
- Hematology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Clévia Rosset
This map shows the geographic impact of Clévia Rosset's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clévia Rosset with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clévia Rosset more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clévia Rosset
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clévia Rosset. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clévia Rosset. The network helps show where Clévia Rosset may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clévia Rosset, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 1 |
About Clévia Rosset
Clévia Rosset is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Hematology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (6 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (5 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (5 papers), Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (98 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations), Oncology (58 citations), Neurology (26 citations) and Hematology (18 citations). Clévia Rosset has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Patrícia Ashton‐Prolla, Cristina Brinckmann Oliveira Netto, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki, Fernanda de Paris, Maria Isabel Achatz, Afonso Luís Barth, Priscila Lamb Wink, Andreza Francisco Martins, Eliane Bandinelli and Filippo Pinto e Vairo. Their work appears in journals such as Haemophilia, Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, PLoS ONE and Gene.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.