Cleo Small

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Cleo Small is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Cleo Small has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Cleo Small's work include Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers), Marine animal studies overview (5 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (5 papers). Cleo Small is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers), Marine animal studies overview (5 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (5 papers). Cleo Small collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Cleo Small's co-authors include Richard A. Phillips, Maria P. Dias, Ben Lascelles, Ramūnas Žydelis, John P. Croxall, Pablo García Borboroglu, Elizabeth J. Pearmain, Oliver Yates, Ian J. Burfield and Robert W. Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Biological Conservation and ICES Journal of Marine Science.

In The Last Decade

Cleo Small

9 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Threats to seabirds: A global assessment 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cleo Small United Kingdom 7 1.0k 390 256 125 84 9 1.1k
Oliver Yates United Kingdom 12 1.0k 1.0× 434 1.1× 329 1.3× 104 0.8× 68 0.8× 26 1.1k
José Manuel Arcos Spain 24 1.3k 1.3× 686 1.8× 258 1.0× 133 1.1× 107 1.3× 47 1.4k
Ben Sullivan United Kingdom 15 1.1k 1.1× 364 0.9× 321 1.3× 188 1.5× 80 1.0× 20 1.3k
Mark A. Ricca United States 20 1.0k 1.0× 624 1.6× 336 1.3× 66 0.5× 40 0.5× 66 1.2k
Rachael Alderman Australia 19 883 0.9× 304 0.8× 257 1.0× 120 1.0× 76 0.9× 39 1.1k
Mark S. Woodrey United States 18 930 0.9× 301 0.8× 238 0.9× 164 1.3× 106 1.3× 64 1.2k
W. Sean Boyd Canada 22 994 1.0× 252 0.6× 299 1.2× 141 1.1× 132 1.6× 66 1.1k
Iván Ramírez Portugal 16 814 0.8× 316 0.8× 157 0.6× 248 2.0× 93 1.1× 32 953
Paul M. Regular Canada 19 758 0.8× 407 1.0× 244 1.0× 67 0.5× 53 0.6× 45 1.0k
Elizabeth J. Pearmain United Kingdom 7 613 0.6× 227 0.6× 124 0.5× 70 0.6× 53 0.6× 9 693

Countries citing papers authored by Cleo Small

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cleo Small's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cleo Small with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cleo Small more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cleo Small

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cleo Small. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cleo Small. The network helps show where Cleo Small may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cleo Small

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cleo Small. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cleo Small based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cleo Small. Cleo Small is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Clay, Thomas A., Cleo Small, Geoffrey N. Tuck, et al.. (2019). A comprehensive large‐scale assessment of fisheries bycatch risk to threatened seabird populations. Journal of Applied Ecology. 56(8). 1882–1893. 79 indexed citations
2.
Dias, Maria P., Robert W. Martin, Elizabeth J. Pearmain, et al.. (2019). Threats to seabirds: A global assessment. Biological Conservation. 237. 525–537. 528 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Dias, Maria P., Steffen Oppel, Alexander L. Bond, et al.. (2017). Using globally threatened pelagic birds to identify priority sites for marine conservation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Biological Conservation. 211. 76–84. 38 indexed citations
4.
Lascelles, Ben, Philip R. Taylor, Mark G. R. Miller, et al.. (2016). Applying global criteria to tracking data to define important areas for marine conservation. Diversity and Distributions. 22(4). 422–431. 170 indexed citations
5.
Žydelis, Ramūnas, et al.. (2013). The incidental catch of seabirds in gillnet fisheries: A global review. Biological Conservation. 162. 76–88. 204 indexed citations
6.
Small, Cleo, et al.. (2013). REVIEW OF TUNA REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATIONS LONGLINE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVER PROGRAMMES. 2 indexed citations
7.
Small, Cleo, Susan M. Waugh, & Richard A. Phillips. (2012). The justification, design and implementation of Ecological Risk Assessments of the effects of fishing on seabirds. Marine Policy. 37. 192–199. 24 indexed citations
8.
Tuck, Geoffrey N., Robert Phillips, Cleo Small, et al.. (2011). An assessment of seabird–fishery interactions in the Atlantic Ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 68(8). 1628–1637. 83 indexed citations
9.
Dunn, Euan, Ben Sullivan, & Cleo Small. (2007). Albatross conservation: from identifying problems to implementing policy. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 17(S1). S165–S170. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026