Clem Pryke

957 total citations
8 papers, 112 citations indexed

About

Clem Pryke is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Clem Pryke has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 112 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 1 paper in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Clem Pryke's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). Clem Pryke is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). Clem Pryke collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Clem Pryke's co-authors include Ryan Hennessy, D. P. Woody, J. E. Carlstrom, Tony Mroczkowski, Stephen Muchovej, James W. Lamb, Christopher H. Greer, David Hawkins, Matthew K. Sharp and E. M. Leitch and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Review of Scientific Instruments and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

In The Last Decade

Clem Pryke

7 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Clem Pryke United States	5	105	33	17	4	3	8	112
F. Cavallaro Italy	6	96 0.9×	35 1.1×	13 0.8×	2 0.5×	2 0.7×	20	99
Michael Blomqvist France	5	102 1.0×	33 1.0×	32 1.9×	5 1.3×	2 0.7×	8	106
M. Ashdown United Kingdom	2	117 1.1×	54 1.6×	15 0.9×	2 0.5×	3 1.0×	2	120
Alexa M. Morales United States	4	95 0.9×	22 0.7×	35 2.1×	2 0.5×	3 1.0×	5	102
Yun-Ting Cheng United States	7	119 1.1×	60 1.8×	39 2.3×	6 1.5×	5 1.7×	17	136
Bill Carithers Switzerland	1	94 0.9×	34 1.0×	25 1.5×	4 1.0×		2	96
Calvin B. Netterfield Canada	4	84 0.8×	26 0.8×	37 2.2×	4 1.0×	1 0.3×	10	93
Nikki Arendse Sweden	6	72 0.7×	22 0.7×	22 1.3×	2 0.5×	4 1.3×	10	82
R. Charlassier France	3	91 0.9×	19 0.6×	21 1.2×	4 1.0×		6	94
А. С. Москвитин Russia	8	135 1.3×	30 0.9×	22 1.3×	6 1.5×		28	142

Countries citing papers authored by Clem Pryke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clem Pryke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clem Pryke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clem Pryke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clem Pryke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clem Pryke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clem Pryke. The network helps show where Clem Pryke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clem Pryke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clem Pryke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clem Pryke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clem Pryke. Clem Pryke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Carron, Julien, et al.. (2024). CMB-S4: Iterative Internal Delensing and r Constraints. The Astrophysical Journal. 964(2). 148–148. 19 indexed citations

2.

Sharp, Matthew K., Daniel P. Marrone, J. E. Carlstrom, et al.. (2010). A MEASUREMENT OF ARCMINUTE ANISOTROPY IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND WITH THE SUNYAEV-ZEL’DOVICH ARRAY. The Astrophysical Journal. 713(1). 82–89. 8 indexed citations

3.

Hasler, Nicole, Esra Bülbül, Marshall Joy, et al.. (2009). Cosmology Independent Measurement of the Gas Mass Fraction Using Chandra X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Measurements of High Redshift Clusters. 26. 1 indexed citations

4.

Mroczkowski, Tony, Massimiliano Bonamente, J. E. Carlstrom, et al.. (2009). APPLICATION OF A SELF-SIMILAR PRESSURE PROFILE TO SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT DATA FROM GALAXY CLUSTERS. The Astrophysical Journal. 694(2). 1034–1044. 41 indexed citations

5.

Woody, D. P., Stephen L. Scott, James W. Lamb, et al.. (2007). Controller-area-network bus control and monitor system for a radio astronomy interferometer. Review of Scientific Instruments. 78(9).

6.

Muchovej, Stephen, Tony Mroczkowski, J. E. Carlstrom, et al.. (2007). Observations of High‐Redshift X‐Ray Selected Clusters with the Sunyaev‐Zel’dovich Array. The Astrophysical Journal. 663(2). 708–716. 36 indexed citations

7.

O’Sullivan, Créidhe, J. A. Murphy, G. Cahill, et al.. (2007). Modelling of the optical performance of millimeter-wave instruments in MODAL. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6472. 64720D–64720D. 6 indexed citations

8.

Pryke, Clem. (1998). Auger: What, Why and How?. 312–320. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact