Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Surface Wave Methods for Near-Surface Site Characterization
2014258 citationsSebastiano Foti, Carlo G. Lai et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Strobbia
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Strobbia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Strobbia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Strobbia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Strobbia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Strobbia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Strobbia. The network helps show where Claudio Strobbia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudio Strobbia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudio Strobbia.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudio Strobbia based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Claudio Strobbia. Claudio Strobbia is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Strobbia, Claudio, et al.. (2015). 2D Seismic Lines Reprocessing Test Using Common Reflection Surface Technique. Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition.1 indexed citations
Cassiani, Giorgio, et al.. (2009). Time-lapse surface-to-surface GPR measurements to monitor a controlled infiltration experiment. Research Padua Archive (University of Padua).11 indexed citations
15.
Godio, Alberto & Claudio Strobbia. (2007). Analisys of borehole guided wave for geotechnical application. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino).
Strobbia, Claudio, et al.. (2006). Inversion of interfacial waves for the geotechnical characterisation of marine sediments in shallow water. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino). 47(2). 145–162.6 indexed citations
18.
Cassiani, Giorgio, et al.. (2006). Monitoring of hydrological hillslope processes via time-lapse ground-penetrating radar guided waves. BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca). 47. 125–144.6 indexed citations
19.
Comina, Cesare, Sebastiano Foti, Laura Valentina Socco, & Claudio Strobbia. (2004). Geophysical characterisation for seepage potential assessment along the embankment of the Po River. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino).1 indexed citations
20.
Sambuelli, Luigi, et al.. (2003). INDAGINI GEOFISICHE PER LA CARATTERIZZAZIONEDELSOTTOSUOLO INTERESSATO DALLA COSTRUENDAMETROPOLITANA DI TORINO. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.