Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes*
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Ferraz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Ferraz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Ferraz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Ferraz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Ferraz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Ferraz. The network helps show where Claudio Ferraz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudio Ferraz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudio Ferraz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudio Ferraz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Claudio Ferraz. Claudio Ferraz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ferraz, Claudio, et al.. (2017). Money and Politics: The Effects of Campaign Spending Limits on Political Competition and Incumbency Advantage. National Bureau of Economic Research.4 indexed citations
Ferraz, Claudio, et al.. (2015). Procuring Firm Growth: The Effects of Government Purchases on Firm Dynamics. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Ferraz, Claudio, Frederico Finan, & Diana Moreira. (2012). Corrupting Learning: Evidence from Missing Federal Education Funds in Brazil. NBER Working Paper No. 18150.. National Bureau of Economic Research.7 indexed citations
11.
Ferraz, Claudio & Barbara Bruns. (2012). Paying Teachers to Perform: The impact of bonus pay in Pernambuco, Brazil. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.4 indexed citations
Ferraz, Claudio, et al.. (2008). Corrupção, Má Gestão, e Desempenho Educacional: Evidências a Partir da Fiscalização dos Municípios. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
14.
Ferraz, Claudio & Ronaldo Serôa da Motta. (2002). Regulação, Mercado ou Pressão Social? Os Determinantes do Investimento Ambiental na Industria *. www.ipea.gov.br.14 indexed citations
15.
Ferraz, Claudio. (2001). Explaining Agriculture Expansion and Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon – 1980/98. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
16.
Ferraz, Claudio. (2001). O ENSINO DE GEOGRAFIA PARA ALÉM DA GEOMETRIZAÇÃO DO ESPAÇO: APONTAMENTOS ENTRE O REDONDO E AS RETAS. 1(23). 38–50.
17.
Ortiz, Ramón Arigoni, Ronaldo Serôa da Motta, & Claudio Ferraz. (2001). Estimando o valor ambiental do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu: uma aplicação do método de custo de viagem. Econstor (Econstor).4 indexed citations
Motta, Ronaldo Serôa da, et al.. (2000). Mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo e o financiamento do desenvolvimento sustentável no Brasil. www.ipea.gov.br.
20.
Ortiz, Ramón Arigoni, Ronaldo Serôa da Motta, & Claudio Ferraz. (2000). A Estimação do valor ambiental do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu através do método de custo viagem. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.