Claire Warden
About
In The Last Decade
Claire Warden
6 papers receiving 53 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Surgery 31
- Oncology 20
- Rheumatology 15
- General Health Professions 13
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Claire Warden
This map shows the geographic impact of Claire Warden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claire Warden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claire Warden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claire Warden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claire Warden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claire Warden. The network helps show where Claire Warden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claire Warden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claire Warden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claire Warden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claire Warden. Claire Warden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | Tattooing gone wrong | 1 |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | A rare congenital midline cervical cleft. | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.