Claire Hanley

1.3k total citations
18 papers, 126 citations indexed

About

Claire Hanley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Claire Hanley has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 126 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Neurology and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Claire Hanley's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). Claire Hanley is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). Claire Hanley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Malta. Claire Hanley's co-authors include David J. McGonigle, Krish D. Singh, Andrea Tales, Mark Tommerdahl, Emma Richards, Jeremy J. Tree, Antony Bayer, Hana Burianová, Anna Torrens‐Burton and Amy Jenkins and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neuroscience and International Journal of Obesity.

In The Last Decade

Claire Hanley

16 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Claire Hanley United Kingdom	8	89	54	30	15	11	18	126
Kilian Abellaneda‐Pérez Spain	10	158 1.8×	109 2.0×	42 1.4×	17 1.1×	26 2.4×	25	220
Tracy Erwin-Grabner Germany	4	41 0.5×	58 1.1×	18 0.6×	19 1.3×	5 0.5×	4	96
Renée S. Schluter Netherlands	8	109 1.2×	99 1.8×	24 0.8×	13 0.9×	18 1.6×	11	161
Temmuz Karali Germany	6	94 1.1×	49 0.9×	24 0.8×	24 1.6×	20 1.8×	12	144
Da Chang China	8	186 2.1×	84 1.6×	16 0.5×	21 1.4×	15 1.4×	10	227
Nastaran Malmir Iran	4	79 0.9×	23 0.4×	32 1.1×	13 0.9×	6 0.5×	6	104
Notger Mueller Germany	6	73 0.8×	70 1.3×	11 0.4×	18 1.2×	5 0.5×	15	152
Chiara Bagattini Italy	8	255 2.9×	126 2.3×	26 0.9×	13 0.9×	15 1.4×	17	294
Matthew W. Flounders United States	8	218 2.4×	74 1.4×	13 0.4×	15 1.0×	31 2.8×	10	251
Derrick Matthew Buchanan Canada	7	51 0.6×	60 1.1×	41 1.4×	11 0.7×	3 0.3×	17	148

Countries citing papers authored by Claire Hanley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claire Hanley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claire Hanley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claire Hanley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claire Hanley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claire Hanley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claire Hanley. The network helps show where Claire Hanley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claire Hanley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claire Hanley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claire Hanley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claire Hanley. Claire Hanley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Richards, Lorie, Claire Hanley, Claire M. Barnes, et al.. (2024). Individual Differences in the Impact of Distracting Environmental Sounds on the Performance of a Continuous Visual Task in Older Adults. Brain Sciences. 14(11). 1048–1048.

Hanley, Claire, et al.. (2023). The effects of age bias on neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful response inhibition in younger and older adults. Neurobiology of Aging. 131. 1–10.

Marstaller, Lars, Hana Burianová, David Benton, et al.. (2022). Weaker connectivity in resting state networks is associated with disinhibited eating in older adults. International Journal of Obesity. 46(4). 859–865. 3 indexed citations

Hanley, Claire, et al.. (2022). The effects of age-bias on neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful response inhibition. Behavioural Brain Research. 428. 113877–113877. 1 indexed citations

Richards, Emma, et al.. (2021). Reaction Time Decomposition as a Tool to Study Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports. 5(1). 625–636. 1 indexed citations

Hanley, Claire & Andrea Tales. (2021). Visual Attention-Related Processing: Perspectives from Ageing, Cognitive Decline and Dementia. Brain Sciences. 11(2). 206–206. 1 indexed citations

Hanley, Claire, et al.. (2020). Optimising Cognitive Enhancement: Systematic Assessment of the Effects of tDCS Duration in Older Adults. Brain Sciences. 10(5). 304–304. 12 indexed citations

Torrens‐Burton, Anna, et al.. (2020). Lacking Pace but Not Precision: Age-Related Information Processing Changes in Response to a Dynamic Attentional Control Task. Brain Sciences. 10(6). 390–390. 7 indexed citations

Richards, Emma, et al.. (2019). Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Insights from Reaction Time Measures. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 72(3). 845–857. 10 indexed citations

10.

Richards, Emma, et al.. (2019). Reaction Time and Visible White Matter Lesions in Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 72(3). 859–865. 7 indexed citations

11.

Shafto, Meredith A., Richard N. Henson, Fiona E. Matthews, et al.. (2019). Cognitive Diversity in a Healthy Aging Cohort: Cross-Domain Cognition in the Cam-CAN Project. Journal of Aging and Health. 32(9). 1029–1041. 14 indexed citations

12.

Hanley, Claire, Hana Burianová, & Mark Tommerdahl. (2019). Towards Establishing Age-Related Cortical Plasticity on the Basis of Somatosensation. Neuroscience. 404. 407–412. 5 indexed citations

13.

Torrens‐Burton, Anna, Amy Jenkins, Ian M. Thornton, et al.. (2019). Sequential Information Processing: The "Elevated First Response Effect" Can Contribute to Exaggerated Intra-Individual Variability in Older Adults.. PubMed. 92(1). 13–20. 9 indexed citations

14.

Hanley, Claire & Andrea Tales. (2019). Anodal tDCS improves attentional control in older adults. Brain stimulation. 12(2). 399–399. 1 indexed citations

15.

Hanley, Claire & Andrea Tales. (2018). Anodal tDCS improves attentional control in older adults. Experimental Gerontology. 115. 88–95. 11 indexed citations

16.

Hanley, Claire, Krish D. Singh, & David J. McGonigle. (2015). Transcranial modulation of brain oscillatory responses: A concurrent tDCS–MEG investigation. NeuroImage. 140. 20–32. 37 indexed citations

17.

Hanley, Claire, Mark Tommerdahl, & David J. McGonigle. (2015). Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 9. 400–400. 6 indexed citations

18.

Hanley, Claire, et al.. (2007). Understanding the monitoring of intracranial pressure: a benchmark for better practice. British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 3(6). 276–281. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact