CJ van Asperen

607 total citations
3 papers, 145 citations indexed

About

CJ van Asperen is a scholar working on Genetics, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, CJ van Asperen has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 145 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Genetics, 1 paper in Surgery and 1 paper in Oncology. Recurrent topics in CJ van Asperen's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper). CJ van Asperen is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper). CJ van Asperen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Switzerland. CJ van Asperen's co-authors include Alfonso Frigerio, Simonetta Bianchi, Robert E. Mansel, Emiel J. Rutgers, Philip Poortmans, Peter Regitnig, Clive Wells, Luigi Cataliotti, Yvonne Wengström and Antonio Ponti and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Genetics.

In The Last Decade

CJ van Asperen

3 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

CJ van Asperen
Sarah M. Lima United States
Yvonne van Riet Netherlands
Mathias Warm Germany
Sajid Durrani Saudi Arabia
Harpal Kumar United Kingdom
Penny Coulson United Kingdom
Vida Almario Passero United States
Sarah M. Lima United States
CJ van Asperen
Citations per year, relative to CJ van Asperen CJ van Asperen (= 1×) peers Sarah M. Lima

Countries citing papers authored by CJ van Asperen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of CJ van Asperen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CJ van Asperen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CJ van Asperen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by CJ van Asperen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by CJ van Asperen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by CJ van Asperen. The network helps show where CJ van Asperen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of CJ van Asperen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of CJ van Asperen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of CJ van Asperen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with CJ van Asperen. CJ van Asperen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
1.
Santandrea, Giacomo, Katja N. Gaarenstroom, Judith R. Kroep, et al.. (2019). EP973 ‘Tumour First’: an institutional experience of reflex tumour BRCA testing in ovarian epithelial carcinomas. A516.1–A516. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wilson, A.R.M., Lorenza Marotti, Simonetta Bianchi, et al.. (2013). The requirements of a specialist Breast Centre. European Journal of Cancer. 49(17). 3579–3587. 110 indexed citations
3.
Vos, Joël, JC Oosterwijk, E. Gómez, et al.. (2010). Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic-counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2-test results. Clinical Genetics. 79(3). 207–218. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026