Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Applications of multirotor drone technologies in construction management
This map shows the geographic impact of Chunlu Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chunlu Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chunlu Liu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chunlu Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chunlu Liu. The network helps show where Chunlu Liu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chunlu Liu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chunlu Liu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chunlu Liu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chunlu Liu. Chunlu Liu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ma, Le & Chunlu Liu. (2015). Is there Long-Run Equilibrium in the House Prices of Australian Capital Cities?. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 18(4). 503–521.5 indexed citations
9.
Ma, Le & Chunlu Liu. (2010). Can Investors Hedge Residential Price Dynamics of Australia's Capital Cities?. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 13(1). 30–45.2 indexed citations
10.
Song, Yu, et al.. (2007). Variance analyses of job satisfaction and organizational commitment vs demographic variables - a study on construction managers in Wuhan. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1332–1337.5 indexed citations
11.
Liu, Chunlu, et al.. (2007). A preliminary study on human resource management in international construction. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 7(2). 1–11.3 indexed citations
12.
Liu, Chunlu. (2007). Book review : Managing government property assets by Olga Kaganova and James McKellar (eds). International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 11(3). 191–192.1 indexed citations
13.
Zhou, Jie, et al.. (2007). The economic performance of transportation infrastructure: an empirical study on the recent development of China. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 6(1). 193–197.9 indexed citations
14.
Liu, Chunlu, et al.. (2006). Promoting the reuse and recycling of building demolition materials. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 5(1). 195–200.9 indexed citations
15.
Itoh, Yoshito, et al.. (2006). Lifecycle cost and CO2 emission comparison of conventional and rationalized bridges. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 11. 45–58.3 indexed citations
Liu, Chunlu, et al.. (2004). Information system strategy for promoting demolition project management. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 2276–2282.3 indexed citations
18.
Itoh, Yoshito, et al.. (2001). Lifecycle assessment application for bridge technology development. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 7. 169–186.1 indexed citations
19.
Itoh, Yoshito, et al.. (2001). LIFECYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND COST OF BRIDGES. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 7. 151–168.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.