Christopher T. Goode

18 papers receiving 693 citations

Peers

Christopher T. Goode
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Developmental Biology 329
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 366
  • Sensory Systems 55
  • Social Psychology 211
  • Ecology 212
Replace Mei-Fang Cheng with:
Mei-Fang Cheng United States
Ei‐Ichi Izawa Japan
Enrique T. Segura Argentina
Micheal L. Dent United States
Kohta I. Kobayasi Japan
Michelle L. Tomaszycki United States
James H. Fox United States
Jo Fritz United States
Miranda Stevenson United Kingdom
Elaine E. Whiskin Canada
Christopher T. Goode relative to Mei-Fang Cheng United States Mei-Fang Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Mei-Fang Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher T. Goode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher T. Goode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher T. Goode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher T. Goode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher T. Goode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher T. Goode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher T. Goode. The network helps show where Christopher T. Goode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher T. Goode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher T. Goode Line = papers co-authored together Christopher T. Goode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200699
2 200894
3 199169
4 201157
5 199755
6 200548
7 200945
8 200745
9 200742
10 201735
11 200627
12 200824
13 200122
14 199921
15 201812
16 20076
17
Scientific research self-efficacy among undergraduates: Current contexts and approaches for measurement
20123
18
Collaborative vs. Apprenticed Undergraduate Research Experiences
20181

About Christopher T. Goode

Christopher T. Goode is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology, Ecology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (8 papers), Marine animal studies overview (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (329 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (366 citations), Sensory Systems (55 citations), Social Psychology (211 citations) and Ecology (212 citations). Christopher T. Goode has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donna L. Maney, Terry D. Blumenthal, Henry S. Lange, Sara E. Sanford, Benjamin L. Solomon, Cary H. Leung, John C. Wingfield, Larry J. Young, Elizabeth A. MacDougall‐Shackleton and Edwin W. Rubel. Their work appears in journals such as Endocrinology, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology and Ethology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact