Christopher Steward

30 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers

Christopher Steward
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Neurology 108
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 173
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 216
  • Physiology 227
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 132
Replace Else Rubæk Danielsen with:
Else Rubæk Danielsen Denmark
Carlo Salustri Italy
M. J. W. Prior United Kingdom
Georg Becker Germany
K. Herholz Germany
Monika Dezortová Czechia
In‐Young Choi United States
S. Watanuki Japan
Cristina Cudalbu Switzerland
Lawrence Litt United States
Christopher Steward relative to Else Rubæk Danielsen Denmark Else Rubæk Danielsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Else Rubæk Danielsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Steward

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Steward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Steward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Steward more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Steward

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Steward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Steward. The network helps show where Christopher Steward may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Steward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Steward Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Steward links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021123
2 2014108
3 200895
4 201889
5 201079
6 201664
7 201939
8 202131
9 201524
10 199322
11 201622
12 199021
13 201620
14 201614
15 201511
16 199111
17 20158
18 20207
19 20157
20 19927

About Christopher Steward

Christopher Steward is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 31 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (108 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (173 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (216 citations), Physiology (227 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (132 citations). Christopher Steward has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Desmond, Dennis Velakoulis, Terence J. O’Brien, Charles B. Malpas, Kathryn A. Ellis, Colin L. Masters, David Ames, Lucy Vivash, Pramit M. Phal and Elizabeth Cyarto. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroradiology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neurology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact