Christopher R. Field

649 total citations
22 papers, 517 citations indexed

About

Christopher R. Field is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher R. Field has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 517 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 10 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 7 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Christopher R. Field's work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (5 papers). Christopher R. Field is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (5 papers). Christopher R. Field collaborates with scholars based in United States. Christopher R. Field's co-authors include Pehr E. Pehrsson, Junghoon Yeom, Richard I. Masel, Alexander Scheeline, Amin Salehi‐Khojin, Braden C. Giordano, Daniel Ratchford, Todd Brintlinger, Susan L. Rose‐Pehrsson and Kevin Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Applied Physics Letters and Advanced Functional Materials.

In The Last Decade

Christopher R. Field

22 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Christopher R. Field
Mark M. Crain United States
Achim Voigt Germany
Ru Feng China
Robert G. Manley United States
Christopher R. Field
Citations per year, relative to Christopher R. Field Christopher R. Field (= 1×) peers Pierre Montméat

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher R. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher R. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher R. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher R. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher R. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher R. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher R. Field. The network helps show where Christopher R. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher R. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher R. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher R. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher R. Field. Christopher R. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Collins, Greg E., Cy R. Tamanaha, Mark Hammond, et al.. (2017). Trace explosives sensor testbed (TESTbed). Review of Scientific Instruments. 88(3). 34104–34104. 13 indexed citations
2.
Giordano, Braden C., et al.. (2016). Trace Explosives Vapor Generation and Quantitation at Parts per Quadrillion Concentrations. Analytical Chemistry. 88(7). 3747–3753. 19 indexed citations
3.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2015). Minimizing thermal degradation in gas chromatographic quantitation of pentaerythritol tetranitrate. Journal of Chromatography A. 1394. 154–158. 14 indexed citations
4.
Baucom, Jared N., et al.. (2015). Effect of Placing a Probe in an Acoustic Drop Levitator. Journal of vibration and acoustics. 138(1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Spinner, Neil, Christopher R. Field, Mark Hammond, et al.. (2015). Physical and chemical analysis of lithium-ion battery cell-to-cell failure events inside custom fire chamber. Journal of Power Sources. 279. 713–721. 75 indexed citations
6.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2014). Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector. Journal of Visualized Experiments. e51938–e51938. 6 indexed citations
7.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2014). A versatile sensor performance evaluation platform with an impactor-inspired sample chamber and virtual pin grid array. Measurement Science and Technology. 25(6). 65901–65901. 1 indexed citations
8.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2014). Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 3 indexed citations
9.
Field, Christopher R., Mark Hammond, Steven G. Tuttle, et al.. (2014). Demonstration of Experimental Infrastructure for Studying Cell-to-Cell Failure Propagation in Lithium-Ion Batteries. 2 indexed citations
10.
Giordano, Braden C., et al.. (2014). Dynamic headspace generation and quantitation of triacetone triperoxide vapor. Journal of Chromatography A. 1331. 38–43. 17 indexed citations
11.
Yeom, Junghoon, Daniel Ratchford, Christopher R. Field, Todd Brintlinger, & Pehr E. Pehrsson. (2014). Nanowires: Decoupling Diameter and Pitch in Silicon Nanowire Arrays Made by Metal‐Assisted Chemical Etching (Adv. Funct. Mater. 1/2014). Advanced Functional Materials. 24(1). 105–105. 1 indexed citations
12.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2013). Direct liquid deposition calibration method for trace cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine using thermal desorption instrumentation. Journal of Chromatography A. 1282. 178–182. 12 indexed citations
13.
Yeom, Junghoon, Daniel Ratchford, Christopher R. Field, Todd Brintlinger, & Pehr E. Pehrsson. (2013). Decoupling Diameter and Pitch in Silicon Nanowire Arrays Made by Metal‐Assisted Chemical Etching. Advanced Functional Materials. 24(1). 106–116. 76 indexed citations
14.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2012). Characterization of thermal desorption instrumentation with a direct liquid deposition calibration method for trace 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene quantitation. Journal of Chromatography A. 1227. 10–18. 13 indexed citations
15.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2011). Periodically porous top electrodes on vertical nanowire arrays for highly sensitive gas detection. Nanotechnology. 22(35). 355501–355501. 70 indexed citations
16.
Salehi‐Khojin, Amin, Kevin Lin, Christopher R. Field, & Richard I. Masel. (2010). Nonthermal Current-Stimulated Desorption of Gases from Carbon Nanotubes. Science. 329(5997). 1327–1330. 42 indexed citations
17.
Salehi‐Khojin, Amin, Christopher R. Field, Junghoon Yeom, & Richard I. Masel. (2010). Sensitivity of nanotube chemical sensors at the onset of Poole–Frenkel conduction. Applied Physics Letters. 96(16). 27 indexed citations
18.
Field, Christopher R., Junghoon Yeom, Amin Salehi‐Khojin, & Richard I. Masel. (2010). Robust fabrication of selective and reversible polymer coated carbon nanotube-based gas sensors. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical. 148(1). 315–322. 18 indexed citations
19.
Field, Christopher R., et al.. (2009). Sample Handling and Chemical Kinetics in an Acoustically Levitated Drop Microreactor. Analytical Chemistry. 81(20). 8496–8502. 27 indexed citations
20.
Field, Christopher R. & Alexander Scheeline. (2007). Design and implementation of an efficient acoustically levitated drop reactor for in stillo measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments. 78(12). 125102–125102. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026