Christopher McFaul

513 total citations
9 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

Christopher McFaul is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher McFaul has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Oncology, 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Christopher McFaul's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers). Christopher McFaul is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers). Christopher McFaul collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Christopher McFaul's co-authors include John P. Neoptolemos, William Greenhalf, Louis J. Vitone, Roger Mountford, Jinong Feng, Yan Jin, Steve S. Sommer, Zefei Jiang, Jonathan Cohn and Jonathan Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, Gut and Cancer Letters.

In The Last Decade

Christopher McFaul

9 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christopher McFaul United Kingdom	7	276	176	99	81	69	9	368
Ines Miselevich Israel	8	180 0.7×	87 0.5×	62 0.6×	178 2.2×	30 0.4×	13	372
Seiichi YAMAGATA Japan	4	335 1.2×	182 1.0×	41 0.4×	186 2.3×	34 0.5×	14	385
Mirjam M. Polak Netherlands	11	216 0.8×	169 1.0×	69 0.7×	187 2.3×	32 0.5×	14	409
Satoshi Okada Japan	7	121 0.4×	76 0.4×	75 0.8×	59 0.7×	28 0.4×	16	245
Vlasta Sýkorová Czechia	12	143 0.5×	129 0.7×	46 0.5×	78 1.0×	58 0.8×	18	501
Paola Mattiolo Italy	12	311 1.1×	130 0.7×	124 1.3×	39 0.5×	114 1.7×	29	396
Svetlana Tafjord Norway	5	282 1.0×	168 1.0×	52 0.5×	34 0.4×	56 0.8×	7	313
C.‐J. Hsieh Germany	6	164 0.6×	89 0.5×	67 0.7×	101 1.2×	22 0.3×	9	372
Rachel E. Simpson United States	8	142 0.5×	129 0.7×	25 0.3×	47 0.6×	50 0.7×	26	257
Tatsuhiro Ishii Japan	11	116 0.4×	120 0.7×	40 0.4×	90 1.1×	35 0.5×	21	316

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher McFaul

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher McFaul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher McFaul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher McFaul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher McFaul

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher McFaul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher McFaul. The network helps show where Christopher McFaul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher McFaul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher McFaul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher McFaul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher McFaul. Christopher McFaul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dunne, Declan, et al.. (2018). Surgical audit: are we not closing the loop?. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 31(8). 966–972. 2 indexed citations

2.

Smith, Rebecca L., et al.. (2014). The Aetiology of Delay to Commencement of Adjuvant Chemotherapy following Colorectal Resection. International Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014. 1–7. 13 indexed citations

3.

Vitone, Louis J., William Greenhalf, Christopher McFaul, Paula Ghaneh, & John P. Neoptolemos. (2006). The inherited genetics of pancreatic cancer and prospects for secondary screening. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 20(2). 253–283. 31 indexed citations

4.

Cohn, Jonathan, John P. Neoptolemos, Jinong Feng, et al.. (2005). Increased risk of idiopathic chronic pancreatitis in cystic fibrosis carriers. Human Mutation. 26(4). 303–307. 70 indexed citations

5.

McFaul, Christopher, et al.. (2005). Anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 55(2). 252–258. 93 indexed citations

6.

Yan, Li, Christopher McFaul, Nathan Howes, et al.. (2005). Molecular Analysis to Detect Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in High-Risk Groups. Gastroenterology. 128(7). 2124–2130. 91 indexed citations

7.

Grützmann, Robert, Christopher McFaul, Detlef K. Bartsch, et al.. (2004). No evidence for germline mutations of the LKB1/STK11 gene in familial pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Letters. 214(1). 63–68. 20 indexed citations

8.

McFaul, Christopher, Louis J. Vitone, Fiona Campbell, et al.. (2004). Pancreatic hamartoma. Pancreatology. 4(6). 533–538. 47 indexed citations

9.

Vitone, Louis J., Nathan Howes, Yan Li, et al.. (2004). THE ROLE OF MOLECULAR ANALYSIS IN SECONDARY SCREENING FOR PANCREATIC CANCER IN HIGH RISK GROUPS.. Pancreas. 29(4). 328–328. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact