Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Scarfe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Scarfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Scarfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Scarfe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Scarfe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Scarfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Scarfe. The network helps show where Christopher M. Scarfe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher M. Scarfe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher M. Scarfe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher M. Scarfe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher M. Scarfe. Christopher M. Scarfe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scarfe, Christopher M. & David J. Cronin. (1986). Viscosity-temperature relationships of melts at 1 atm in the system diopside-albite. American Mineralogist. 71. 767–771.60 indexed citations
5.
Scarfe, Christopher M.. (1986). Short course in silicate melts.8 indexed citations
Mysen, B. O., David Virgo, Christopher M. Scarfe, & David J. Cronin. (1985). Viscosity and structure of iron- and aluminum-bearing calcium silicate melts at 1 atm.. American Mineralogist. 70. 487–498.71 indexed citations
Elthon, Don & Christopher M. Scarfe. (1984). High-pressure phase equilibria of a high-magnesia basalt and the genesis of primary oceanic basalts. American Mineralogist. 69. 1–15.165 indexed citations
Scarfe, Christopher M., et al.. (1983). Viscosity-temperature relationships at 1 atm in the system diopside-anorthite. American Mineralogist. 68. 1083–1088.70 indexed citations
Mysen, B. O., David Virgo, Wendy J. Harrison, & Christopher M. Scarfe. (1980). Solubility mechanisms of H2O in silicate melts at high pressures and temperatures: a Raman spectroscopic study. American Mineralogist. 65. 900–914.127 indexed citations
17.
Scarfe, Christopher M.. (1977). Viscosity of some basaltic glasses at one atmosphere. The Canadian Mineralogist. 15(2). 190–194.14 indexed citations
18.
Scarfe, Christopher M.. (1977). Viscosity of a pantellerite melt at one atmosphere. The Canadian Mineralogist. 15(2). 185–189.19 indexed citations
19.
Scarfe, Christopher M. & A.J. Piwinskii. (1977). Symposium ProceedingsTHE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST. The Canadian Mineralogist. 15(1). 133–134.2 indexed citations
20.
Scarfe, Christopher M., W. C. Luth, & O. F. Tuttle. (1966). An experimental study bearing on the absence of leucite in plutonic rocks. American Mineralogist. 51. 726–735.34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.