Christopher Kraus

713 total citations
8 papers, 500 citations indexed

About

Christopher Kraus is a scholar working on Plant Science, Rehabilitation and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Kraus has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 500 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Plant Science, 3 papers in Rehabilitation and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Christopher Kraus's work include Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers) and Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (3 papers). Christopher Kraus is often cited by papers focused on Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers) and Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (3 papers). Christopher Kraus collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Japan. Christopher Kraus's co-authors include Rebecca J. Richardson, Philipp Knyphausen, Krasimir Slanchev, Matthias Hammerschmidt, Sabine A. Eming, Elmon Schmelzer, Georgios Koutsovoulos, Mark Blaxter, Mark J. Taylor and Peter Sarkies and has published in prestigious journals such as Development, Journal of Cell Science and PLoS Biology.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Kraus

8 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christopher Kraus Germany	7	197	130	100	94	65	8	500
Xiaocong Li China	11	397 2.0×	66 0.5×	54 0.5×	32 0.3×	45 0.7×	23	638
Dilip K. Garikipati United States	10	493 2.5×	24 0.2×	43 0.4×	64 0.7×	49 0.8×	12	698
Danny C. LeBert United States	8	169 0.9×	76 0.6×	15 0.1×	138 1.5×	123 1.9×	10	436
Soha A. Soliman Egypt	16	170 0.9×	20 0.2×	18 0.2×	49 0.5×	140 2.2×	56	577
Dang Vinh Singapore	13	600 3.0×	27 0.2×	167 1.7×	43 0.5×	86 1.3×	20	920
Claudia Choi Germany	14	322 1.6×	39 0.3×	48 0.5×	36 0.4×	35 0.5×	22	505
Charles D. Bavington United Kingdom	12	159 0.8×	23 0.2×	24 0.2×	149 1.6×	54 0.8×	17	582
William Razzell United Kingdom	5	180 0.9×	89 0.7×	20 0.2×	189 2.0×	146 2.2×	7	490
Tolulope Ojo United States	9	1.0k 5.2×	19 0.1×	255 2.5×	21 0.2×	70 1.1×	13	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Kraus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Kraus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Kraus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Kraus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Kraus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Kraus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Kraus. The network helps show where Christopher Kraus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Kraus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Kraus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Kraus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Kraus. Christopher Kraus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Kram, Sebastian, Christopher Kraus, Maximilian Stahlke, et al.. (2022). Delay Estimation in Dense Multipath Environments using Time Series Segmentation. 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 32. 1671–1676. 4 indexed citations

Kraus, Christopher, Philipp H. Schiffer, Hiroshi Kagoshima, et al.. (2017). Differences in the genetic control of early egg development and reproduction between C. elegans and its parthenogenetic relative D. coronatus. EvoDevo. 8(1). 16–16. 9 indexed citations

Kagoshima, Hiroshi, Christopher Kraus, Philipp H. Schiffer, et al.. (2017). Genome analysis of Diploscapter coronatus: insights into molecular peculiarities of a nematode with parthenogenetic reproduction. BMC Genomics. 18(1). 478–478. 23 indexed citations

Richardson, Rebecca J., Philipp Knyphausen, Krasimir Slanchev, et al.. (2016). Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals. Journal of Cell Science. 129(13). e1.1–e1.1. 33 indexed citations

Richardson, Rebecca J., Philipp Knyphausen, Krasimir Slanchev, et al.. (2016). Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish uses a combination of mechanisms at play during wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals. Development. 143(12). 2077–88. 82 indexed citations

Sarkies, Peter, Murray E. Selkirk, John T. Jones, et al.. (2015). Ancient and Novel Small RNA Pathways Compensate for the Loss of piRNAs in Multiple Independent Nematode Lineages. PLoS Biology. 13(2). e1002061–e1002061. 102 indexed citations

Richardson, Rebecca J., Krasimir Slanchev, Christopher Kraus, et al.. (2013). Adult Zebrafish as a Model System for Cutaneous Wound-Healing Research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 133(6). 1655–1665. 211 indexed citations

Schiffer, Philipp H., Michael Kroiher, Christopher Kraus, et al.. (2013). The genome of Romanomermis culicivorax: revealing fundamental changes in the core developmental genetic toolkit in Nematoda. BMC Genomics. 14(1). 923–923. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact