Christopher Hurt
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 5%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Soil Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip C. AbbottWallace E. TynerMichael BoehljeBrent A. GloyCraig L. DobbinsTimothy G. BakerJames MintertNathanael M. Thompson
- Topics
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper)Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesEconomics and Econometrics
- Journals
- Journal of agricultural and resource economicsRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
In The Last Decade
Christopher Hurt
6 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Economics and Econometrics 243
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 94
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 74
- Soil Science 53
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Hurt
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Hurt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Hurt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Hurt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Hurt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Hurt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Hurt. The network helps show where Christopher Hurt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Hurt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Hurt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Hurt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Hurt. Christopher Hurt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | What's Driving Food Prices? March 2009 Update | 29 |
| 5 | 232 | |
| 6 | 30 |
About Christopher Hurt
Christopher Hurt is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Finance and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (94 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (77 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (243 citations). Frequent co-authors include Philip C. Abbott, Wallace E. Tyner, Michael Boehlje, Brent A. Gloy, Craig L. Dobbins, Timothy G. Baker, James Mintert and Nathanael M. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of agricultural and resource economics, RePEc: Research Papers in Economics and AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.