Christopher G. Murphy

581 total citations
21 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Christopher G. Murphy is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change and Developmental Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher G. Murphy has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 14 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 9 papers in Developmental Biology. Recurrent topics in Christopher G. Murphy's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (15 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (14 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (9 papers). Christopher G. Murphy is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (15 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (14 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (9 papers). Christopher G. Murphy collaborates with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Christopher G. Murphy's co-authors include H. Carl Gerhardt, Joshua J. Schwartz, M. Dyson, Jonathan W. Swan, Michael J. Lannoo, Robert E. Kearney, Michael Albrink, Alexander S. Rosemurgy, Fernando Rodrigues da Silva and Peter D. Newell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Evolution and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Christopher G. Murphy

21 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher G. Murphy United States 13 414 278 204 65 48 21 460
Sandra Goutte United Arab Emirates 9 241 0.6× 220 0.8× 180 0.9× 48 0.7× 108 2.3× 21 374
Lori Wollerman United States 7 369 0.9× 215 0.8× 307 1.5× 42 0.6× 120 2.5× 7 448
Gregory R. Johnston Australia 9 408 1.0× 311 1.1× 50 0.2× 102 1.6× 131 2.7× 24 529
Emi Arai Japan 15 477 1.2× 80 0.3× 71 0.3× 66 1.0× 228 4.8× 49 557
Nelson A. Velásquez Chile 11 260 0.6× 200 0.7× 227 1.1× 32 0.5× 83 1.7× 33 328
Monique Halloy Argentina 11 275 0.7× 286 1.0× 38 0.2× 43 0.7× 89 1.9× 30 372
Murray J. Littlejohn Australia 11 291 0.7× 251 0.9× 153 0.8× 134 2.1× 65 1.4× 21 416
Kasha Strickland Australia 11 176 0.4× 103 0.4× 52 0.3× 49 0.8× 153 3.2× 24 290
Andreas Hapke Germany 9 163 0.4× 133 0.5× 57 0.3× 78 1.2× 98 2.0× 11 369
Miklós Laczi Hungary 12 342 0.8× 53 0.2× 114 0.6× 38 0.6× 239 5.0× 57 453

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher G. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher G. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher G. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher G. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher G. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher G. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher G. Murphy. The network helps show where Christopher G. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher G. Murphy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher G. Murphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher G. Murphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher G. Murphy. Christopher G. Murphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Newell, Peter D., et al.. (2022). A Functional Analysis of the Purine Salvage Pathway in Acetobacter fabarum. Journal of Bacteriology. 204(7). e0004122–e0004122. 2 indexed citations
2.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (2020). English Learning and Learning Disabilities: Has Research Made Its Way into Practice?.. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 32(4). 304–330. 2 indexed citations
3.
Silva, Fernando Rodrigues da, et al.. (2020). Geographic Variation in the Acoustic Signals of Dendropsophus nanus (Boulenger 1889) (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetologica. 76(3). 267–267. 2 indexed citations
4.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (2015). Upland Calling Behavior in Crawfish Frogs (Lithobates areolatus) and Calling Triggers Caused by Noise Pollution. Copeia. 103(4). 1048–1057. 12 indexed citations
5.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (2012). Simultaneous mate-sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behavioral Ecology. 23(6). 1162–1169. 16 indexed citations
6.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (2008). Assessment of distance to potential mates by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa).. Journal of comparative psychology. 122(3). 264–273. 12 indexed citations
7.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (2007). Preferences of female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for larger males: univariate and composite tests. Animal Behaviour. 73(3). 513–524. 20 indexed citations
8.
Gerhardt, H. Carl, et al.. (2007). Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae). Journal of Experimental Biology. 210(17). 2990–2998. 31 indexed citations
9.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (2007). How female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, use multiple call characteristics to select a mate. Animal Behaviour. 74(5). 1463–1472. 12 indexed citations
10.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (2004). The effect of call amplitude on male spacing in choruses of barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa. Animal Behaviour. 69(2). 419–426. 20 indexed citations
11.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (2003). Timing of Oviposition by Female Barking Treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Journal of Herpetology. 37(3). 580–582. 6 indexed citations
12.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (2002). ANURAN COMMUNICATION. Copeia. 2002(1). 252–254. 1 indexed citations
13.
Murphy, Christopher G. & H. Carl Gerhardt. (2000). MATING PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL FEMALE BARKING TREEFROGS, HYLA GRATIOSA, FOR TWO PROPERTIES OF MALE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS. Evolution. 54(2). 660–669. 70 indexed citations
14.
Murphy, Christopher G. & H. Carl Gerhardt. (2000). MATING PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS OF INDIVIDUAL FEMALE BARKING TREEFROGS, HYLA GRATIOSA, FOR TWO PROPERTIES OF MALE ADVERTISEMENT CALLS. Evolution. 54(2). 660–660. 8 indexed citations
15.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (1999). Nightly Timing of Chorusing by Male Barking Treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa): The Influence of Female Arrival and Energy. Copeia. 1999(2). 333–333. 32 indexed citations
16.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (1998). Interaction-Independent Sexual Selection and the Mechanisms of Sexual Selection. Evolution. 52(1). 8–8. 29 indexed citations
17.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (1998). INTERACTION-INDEPENDENT SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE MECHANISMS OF SEXUAL SELECTION. Evolution. 52(1). 8–18. 61 indexed citations
18.
Murphy, Christopher G., et al.. (1996). Evaluating the design of mate-choice experiments: the effect of amplexus on mate choice by female barking treefrogs,Hyla gratiosa. Animal Behaviour. 51(4). 881–890. 35 indexed citations
19.
Murphy, Christopher G.. (1994). Chorus tenure of male barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa. Animal Behaviour. 48(4). 763–777. 60 indexed citations
20.
Rosemurgy, Alexander S., et al.. (1990). Treatment of Candidosis in Severely Injured Adults with Short-course, Low-dose Amphotericin B. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 30(12). 1521–1523. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026