Christopher E. Bunker

6.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
109 papers, 5.3k citations indexed

About

Christopher E. Bunker is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher E. Bunker has authored 109 papers receiving a total of 5.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Materials Chemistry, 24 papers in Organic Chemistry and 24 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Christopher E. Bunker's work include Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (27 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (18 papers) and Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (16 papers). Christopher E. Bunker is often cited by papers focused on Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (27 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (18 papers) and Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (16 papers). Christopher E. Bunker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Iceland and China. Christopher E. Bunker's co-authors include Ya‐Ping Sun, K. A. Shiral Fernando, Elena A. Guliants, Ping Wang, Sushant P. Sahu, William K. Lewis, Yamin Liu, Li Cao, Pengju G. Luo and Bin Ma and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

Christopher E. Bunker

107 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Hit Papers

Carbon Quantum Dots and Applications in Photocatalytic En... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2015 2011 2011 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher E. Bunker United States 37 4.0k 1.3k 1.1k 721 660 109 5.3k
Paola Carbone United Kingdom 31 3.9k 1.0× 3.2k 2.3× 732 0.7× 1.2k 1.7× 293 0.4× 103 6.5k
Douglas A. Loy United States 42 4.8k 1.2× 868 0.6× 1.3k 1.3× 977 1.4× 320 0.5× 144 7.2k
Thomas Weber Switzerland 36 2.6k 0.7× 460 0.3× 705 0.7× 701 1.0× 538 0.8× 129 4.7k
Shan Wang China 36 4.9k 1.2× 641 0.5× 564 0.5× 2.0k 2.8× 1.1k 1.7× 135 6.5k
Sono Sasaki Japan 32 2.4k 0.6× 651 0.5× 827 0.8× 1.1k 1.5× 447 0.7× 156 4.9k
Jie Zhao China 35 2.4k 0.6× 640 0.5× 749 0.7× 1.3k 1.9× 1.1k 1.6× 197 4.6k
Ottó Berkesi Hungary 25 1.9k 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 356 0.3× 876 1.2× 251 0.4× 68 3.6k
E. Reguera Mexico 39 3.0k 0.8× 791 0.6× 713 0.7× 1.4k 1.9× 672 1.0× 291 6.3k
Guglielmo G. Condorelli Italy 39 2.4k 0.6× 620 0.5× 710 0.7× 1.7k 2.3× 361 0.5× 224 5.0k
Zhiqiang Li China 43 4.2k 1.1× 1.5k 1.1× 717 0.7× 1.2k 1.7× 242 0.4× 254 6.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher E. Bunker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher E. Bunker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher E. Bunker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher E. Bunker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher E. Bunker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher E. Bunker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher E. Bunker. The network helps show where Christopher E. Bunker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher E. Bunker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher E. Bunker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher E. Bunker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher E. Bunker. Christopher E. Bunker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McFarland, Michael J., et al.. (2024). Combustion-Induced Endothermic Process in Carbon Dots Synthesized on Magnetite Nanoparticle Substrate. Crystals. 14(6). 520–520. 1 indexed citations
2.
Liang, Weixiong, Lin Ge, Xiaofang Hou, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of Commercial “Carbon Quantum Dots” Sample on Origins of Red Absorption and Emission Features. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(4). 70–70. 20 indexed citations
3.
Cao, Li, K. A. Shiral Fernando, Weixiong Liang, et al.. (2019). Carbon dots for energy conversion applications. Journal of Applied Physics. 125(22). 50 indexed citations
4.
Liu, Yamin, Yun Liu, Haijun Qian, et al.. (2018). Carbon–TiO2hybrid dots in different configurations – optical properties, redox characteristics, and mechanistic implications. New Journal of Chemistry. 42(13). 10798–10806. 8 indexed citations
5.
Altman, Alison B., C. D. Pemmaraju, Selim Alayoǧlu, et al.. (2017). Chemical and Morphological Inhomogeneity of Aluminum Metal and Oxides from Soft X-ray Spectromicroscopy. Inorganic Chemistry. 56(10). 5710–5719. 15 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Ping, Jiahui Liu, Yin Hu, et al.. (2017). Host–guest carbon dots as high-performance fluorescence probes. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 5(25). 6328–6335. 30 indexed citations
7.
Hu, Yin, Fan Yang, Sijia Yan, et al.. (2016). Photoexcited state properties of carbon dots from thermally induced functionalization of carbon nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 4(44). 10554–10561. 38 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Brandon J., et al.. (2015). Infrared spectroscopy of Mg–CO2 and Al–CO2 complexes in helium nanodroplets. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 142(17). 174310–174310. 9 indexed citations
9.
Kim, Ji Hoon, Chang Hyo Kim, Hyeonseok Yoon, et al.. (2015). Rationally engineered surface properties of carbon nanofibers for the enhanced supercapacitive performance of binary metal oxide nanosheets. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 3(39). 19867–19872. 13 indexed citations
10.
Fernando, K. A. Shiral, et al.. (2014). Migration of Silver Nanoparticles from Silver Decorated Graphene Oxide to Other Carbon Nanostructures. Langmuir. 30(39). 11776–11784. 22 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Brandon J., Christopher E. Bunker, Elena A. Guliants, et al.. (2013). Synthesis of aluminum nanoparticles capped with copolymerizable epoxides. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 15(6). 18 indexed citations
12.
Vogel, F. Lincoln, et al.. (2012). Graphite-based material development for reconfigurable antennas. Journal of Bioresource Management. 1–7. 3 indexed citations
13.
Bunker, Christopher E., et al.. (2010). Classification of Jet Fuel Properties by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Using Fuzzy Rule-Building Expert Systems and Support Vector Machines. Applied Spectroscopy. 64(11). 1251–1258. 16 indexed citations
14.
Fraundorf, P., et al.. (2008). Synthesis and Characterization of Srilankite Nanowires. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 8(3). 1481–1488. 7 indexed citations
15.
Guliants, Elena A., et al.. (2005). FUNCTIONAL NANOPARTICLES IN THIN FILMS AS SENSING MEDIA. REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE. 10(4). 4 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Joondong, Wayne A. Anderson, Elena A. Guliants, & Christopher E. Bunker. (2004). Morphological Changes while Growing Nickel Monosilicide Nanowires. MRS Proceedings. 854.
17.
Bunker, Christopher E., Harry W. Rollins, Bin Ma, et al.. (1999). Fluorescence spectroscopic probing of two distinctive microenvironments in perfluorinated ionomer membranes. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry. 126(1-3). 71–76. 20 indexed citations
19.
20.
Sun, Ya‐Ping & Christopher E. Bunker. (1993). C70 in solvent mixtures. Nature. 365(6445). 398–398. 87 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026