Christopher C. Ford

699 citations
7 papers · 546 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Papers in

Christopher C. Ford

7 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Christopher C. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Aging 13
  • Molecular Biology 435
  • Cell Biology 84
  • Genetics 88
  • Genetics 33
Replace Gloryn Chia with:
Gloryn Chia United States
Michelle Desler United States
Mina Kojima United States
Christa Bode Germany
Hsiao Yun Chan Singapore
Katsuyoshi Takaoka Japan
Yanzhen Cui United States
Takahiro Aoto Japan
Ashley C. Kramer United States
Fabienne De Graeve France
Christopher C. Ford relative to Gloryn Chia United States Gloryn Chia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Gloryn Chia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher C. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher C. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher C. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher C. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher C. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher C. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher C. Ford. The network helps show where Christopher C. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher C. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher C. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Christopher C. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2010307
2 198878
3 197563
4 200435
5 200032
6 200323
7 19838

About Christopher C. Ford

Christopher C. Ford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Oncology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers), Renal and related cancers (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper) and Nuclear Structure and Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (13 citations), Molecular Biology (435 citations), Cell Biology (84 citations), Genetics (88 citations) and Genetics (33 citations). Christopher C. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Hutchison, Richard F. Cox, Robert M. Benbow, Robert Lafyatis, Jyh‐Chang Jean, Daniel J. Weiss, Brenden W. Smith, Paul Gadue, Jason A. Mills and Gustavo Mostoslavsky. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Biology of the Cell, The Journal of Cell Biology, Stem Cells, Developmental Biology and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact