Chris Pook
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 3
- Ecology 6
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology 4
- Co-authors
- Michelle Ji Yeon Yoo (6 shared papers)Tung Thanh Diep (5 shared papers)Tamara S. Galloway (4 shared papers)Ceri Lewis (3 shared papers)Ian Laycock (1 shared paper)Charles R. Tyler (1 shared paper)Natalie Hempel de Ibarra (1 shared paper)James Cresswell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nutrients (4 papers)Marine Pollution Bulletin (3 papers)Foods (2 papers)Environmental Pollution (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Pook
33 papers receiving 578 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Biochemistry 86
- Insect Science 157
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 109
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 137
- Food Science 118
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Pook
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Pook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Pook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Pook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Pook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Pook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Pook. The network helps show where Chris Pook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Pook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 132 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 6 |
About Chris Pook
Chris Pook is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (86 citations), Insect Science (157 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (109 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (137 citations) and Food Science (118 citations). Chris Pook has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Ji Yeon Yoo, Tung Thanh Diep, Tamara S. Galloway, Ceri Lewis, Ian Laycock, Charles R. Tyler, Natalie Hempel de Ibarra, James Cresswell, Christopher J. Page and Nicholas Smirnoff. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Foods, Environmental Pollution and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.