Chloe J. Bright

995 total citations
18 papers, 465 citations indexed

About

Chloe J. Bright is a scholar working on Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Chloe J. Bright has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 465 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Oncology, 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Chloe J. Bright's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers). Chloe J. Bright is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers). Chloe J. Bright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Chloe J. Bright's co-authors include D. Winter, Clare Frobisher, Raoul C. Reulen, Angela B. Edgar, Katherine E Henson, Martin G. McCabe, Julie Kelly, Mike Hawkins, Joyeeta Guha and Michael M. Hawkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and The Lancet Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Chloe J. Bright

17 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Chloe J. Bright
S J Lee United States
Aarati Didwania United States
Mohamad Farid Singapore
Laurien Daniëls Netherlands
Chloe J. Bright
Citations per year, relative to Chloe J. Bright Chloe J. Bright (= 1×) peers Marianne Phillips

Countries citing papers authored by Chloe J. Bright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe J. Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe J. Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe J. Bright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe J. Bright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe J. Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe J. Bright. The network helps show where Chloe J. Bright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chloe J. Bright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chloe J. Bright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chloe J. Bright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chloe J. Bright. Chloe J. Bright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Levell, N. J., Oliver Kennedy, Kathryn Richardson, et al.. (2025). A national cohort study of melanoma BRAF status, testing patterns, patient and tumour characteristics, treatment and survival in England from 2016 to 2021. British Journal of Dermatology. 193(6). 1146–1154.
2.
Watkins, Lance, Crispin Musicha, Charlotte Lawthom, et al.. (2023). Rapid switching from levetiracetam to brivaracetam in pharmaco-resistant epilepsy in people with and without intellectual disabilities: a naturalistic case control study. Journal of Neurology. 270(12). 5889–5902. 5 indexed citations
3.
Eberhardt, Judith, Chloe J. Bright, Vivian Mak, et al.. (2022). Impact of the third national ‘Be Clear on Cancer’ Breast Cancer in Women over 70 Campaign on general practitioner attendance and referral, diagnosis rates and prevalence awareness. European Journal of Cancer Care. 31(3). e13583–e13583. 7 indexed citations
4.
Merriel, Samuel WD, Susan Ball, Chloe J. Bright, et al.. (2022). A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England. European Journal of Cancer Care. 31(5). e13606–e13606. 5 indexed citations
5.
Bright, Chloe J., Cong Chen, Rebecca Smittenaar, et al.. (2022). Palliative chemotherapy for breast cancer: A population‐based cohort study of emergency hospital admissions and place of death. European Journal of Cancer Care. 31(4). e13598–e13598. 4 indexed citations
6.
Ball, Susan, Chris Hyde, William Hamilton, et al.. (2021). An evaluation of a national mass media campaign to raise public awareness of possible lung cancer symptoms in England in 2016 and 2017. British Journal of Cancer. 126(2). 187–195. 7 indexed citations
7.
Torrance, Nicola, Chloe J. Bright, Catriona Kennedy, et al.. (2021). Abdominal cancer symptoms: Evaluation of the impact of a regional public awareness campaign. European Journal of Cancer Care. 30(6). e13500–e13500. 4 indexed citations
8.
Bright, Chloe J., et al.. (2020). Errors in determination of net survival: cause-specific and relative survival settings. British Journal of Cancer. 122(7). 1094–1101. 19 indexed citations
9.
Bright, Chloe J., et al.. (2020). Does geodemographic segmentation explain differences in route of cancer diagnosis above and beyond person-level sociodemographic variables?. Journal of Public Health. 43(4). 797–805. 4 indexed citations
10.
Mak, Vivian, et al.. (2020). Reviewing the impact of 11 national Be Clear on Cancer public awareness campaigns, England, 2012 to 2016: A synthesis of published evaluation results. International Journal of Cancer. 148(5). 1172–1182. 30 indexed citations
11.
Reulen, Raoul C., Joyeeta Guha, Chloe J. Bright, et al.. (2020). Risk of cerebrovascular disease among 13 457 five‐year survivors of childhood cancer: A population‐based cohort study. International Journal of Cancer. 148(3). 572–583. 15 indexed citations
12.
Bright, Chloe J., Raoul C. Reulen, D. Winter, et al.. (2019). Risk of subsequent primary neoplasms in survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer (Teenage and Young Adult Cancer Survivor Study): a population-based, cohort study. The Lancet Oncology. 20(4). 531–545. 91 indexed citations
13.
Bright, Chloe J., Martine Bomb, David Dodwell, et al.. (2019). Data Resource Profile: The Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) dataset. International Journal of Epidemiology. 49(1). 15–15l. 67 indexed citations
14.
Fidler-Benaoudia, Miranda M, Raoul C. Reulen, Chloe J. Bright, et al.. (2018). Respiratory mortality of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Thorax. 73(10). 959–968. 25 indexed citations
15.
Reulen, Raoul C., Chloe J. Bright, D. Winter, et al.. (2017). Pregnancy and Labor Complications in Female Survivors of Childhood Cancer: The British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 109(11). 48 indexed citations
16.
Bright, Chloe J., Mike Hawkins, Joyeeta Guha, et al.. (2017). Risk of Cerebrovascular Events in 178 962 Five-Year Survivors of Cancer Diagnosed at 15 to 39 Years of Age. Circulation. 135(13). 1194–1210. 40 indexed citations
17.
Bright, Chloe J., et al.. (2016). Comparison of quadrant-specific breast cancer incidence trends in the United States and England between 1975 and 2013. Cancer Epidemiology. 44. 186–194. 16 indexed citations
18.
Henson, Katherine E, Raoul C. Reulen, D. Winter, et al.. (2016). Cardiac Mortality Among 200 000 Five-Year Survivors of Cancer Diagnosed at 15 to 39 Years of Age. Circulation. 134(20). 1519–1531. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026