Chiu‐Chu Lin

1.3k total citations
59 papers, 951 citations indexed

About

Chiu‐Chu Lin is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chiu‐Chu Lin has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 951 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 16 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Chiu‐Chu Lin's work include Diabetes Management and Education (19 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (11 papers) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (8 papers). Chiu‐Chu Lin is often cited by papers focused on Diabetes Management and Education (19 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (11 papers) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (8 papers). Chiu‐Chu Lin collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Chiu‐Chu Lin's co-authors include Bih‐O Lee, Chia‐Chi Kuo, Shang‐Jyh Hwang, Bonnie M. Hagerty, Robert M. Anderson, Shu‐Chen Chang, Wendy Chaboyer, Horng‐Rong Chang, Jong‐Da Lian and Shun‐Fa Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Surface Science, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Chiu‐Chu Lin

54 papers receiving 903 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chiu‐Chu Lin Taiwan 18 277 260 243 228 109 59 951
Dori Schatell United States 19 770 2.8× 128 0.5× 306 1.3× 190 0.8× 205 1.9× 49 1.3k
Rasheeda K. Hall United States 17 375 1.4× 120 0.5× 202 0.8× 52 0.2× 147 1.3× 60 922
Flora Au Canada 17 192 0.7× 109 0.4× 176 0.7× 123 0.5× 65 0.6× 40 856
Mohamed A. Osman Canada 13 541 2.0× 81 0.3× 200 0.8× 94 0.4× 130 1.2× 29 1.0k
Martin Howell Australia 24 642 2.3× 126 0.5× 378 1.6× 195 0.9× 377 3.5× 114 1.8k
Kenneth J. Taub Canada 14 490 1.8× 73 0.3× 185 0.8× 116 0.5× 123 1.1× 18 957
Anna Kemp Australia 18 166 0.6× 47 0.2× 217 0.9× 123 0.5× 154 1.4× 58 1.1k
Lianne Barnieh Canada 22 333 1.2× 89 0.3× 304 1.3× 110 0.5× 533 4.9× 58 1.4k
Claudia M. Lora United States 18 622 2.2× 99 0.4× 220 0.9× 145 0.6× 138 1.3× 32 1.2k
Christopher Gamboa United States 14 142 0.5× 153 0.6× 143 0.6× 178 0.8× 93 0.9× 23 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Chiu‐Chu Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chiu‐Chu Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chiu‐Chu Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiu‐Chu Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chiu‐Chu Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chiu‐Chu Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chiu‐Chu Lin. The network helps show where Chiu‐Chu Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chiu‐Chu Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chiu‐Chu Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chiu‐Chu Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chiu‐Chu Lin. Chiu‐Chu Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Suarilah, Ira & Chiu‐Chu Lin. (2021). Factors influencing self‐management among Indonesian patients with early‐stage chronic kidney disease: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 31(5-6). 703–715. 23 indexed citations
3.
Chen, Wen‐Chun, et al.. (2021). A Theory-Based Self-Management Training Program for Older Adult Peer Leaders with Diabetes: A Feasibility Assessment. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Volume 14. 33–44. 6 indexed citations
4.
Chen, Wen‐Chun, et al.. (2021). Psychometric testing of the hemodialysis self‐management instrument (HDSMI‐18): A confirmatory factor analysis. Nursing Open. 8(5). 2832–2839. 2 indexed citations
6.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu & Shang‐Jyh Hwang. (2020). Patient-Centered Self-Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Challenges and Implications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(24). 9443–9443. 22 indexed citations
7.
Wu, Chia‐Chen, et al.. (2019). Development and cross‐validation of a new instrument to measure nurse’s positive energy of retention: A methodological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(11). 3156–3165. 3 indexed citations
8.
Wu, Chia‐Chen, et al.. (2019). Identifying the positive energy for retention in clinical nurses: A focus group study. Journal of Nursing Management. 27(6). 1200–1207. 15 indexed citations
9.
Huang, Yu‐Tung, et al.. (2019). Factors influencing self‐management behaviours among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Solomon Islands. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 29(5-6). 852–862. 16 indexed citations
10.
Kuo, Chia‐Chi, et al.. (2018). A systematic review and meta‐analysis: Effectiveness of internet empowerment‐based self‐management interventions on adults with metabolic diseases. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 74(8). 1787–1802. 26 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Yu‐Mu, et al.. (2018). Effectiveness of a perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation program following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with and without COPD. International Journal of COPD. Volume 13. 1591–1597. 14 indexed citations
12.
Hong, OiSaeng, et al.. (2018). A “Sit Less, Walk More” Workplace Intervention for Office Workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 60(6). e290–e299. 21 indexed citations
13.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu, et al.. (2013). Factors associated with self-management by people undergoing hemodialysis: A descriptive study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 51(2). 208–216. 88 indexed citations
14.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu, et al.. (2012). The chronic kidney disease self-efficacy (CKD-SE) instrument: development and psychometric evaluation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 27(10). 3828–3834. 60 indexed citations
15.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu, Chia‐Chen Wu, Li‐Min Wu, Hsing‐Mei Chen, & Shu‐Chen Chang. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of a new instrument to measure disease self‐management of the early stage chronic kidney disease patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 22(7-8). 1073–1079. 30 indexed citations
16.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu, Chung‐Ping Cheng, Shih‐Hsien Kuo, & Fan‐Hao Chou. (2008). Development of a Chinese short form of the Prenatal Self‐Evaluation Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 18(5). 659–666. 9 indexed citations
17.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu, Robert M. Anderson, Chao‐Sung Chang, Bonnie M. Hagerty, & Carol Loveland‐Cherry. (2008). Development and testing of the diabetes self‐management instrument: A confirmatory analysis. Research in Nursing & Health. 31(4). 370–380. 63 indexed citations
18.
Chang, Horng-Rong, et al.. (2005). Formation of 8-nitroguanine in blood of patients with inflammatory gouty arthritis. Clinica Chimica Acta. 362(1-2). 170–175. 6 indexed citations
19.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu, Bih‐O Lee, & Frank D. Hicks. (2005). The Phenomenology of Deciding About Hemodialysis Among Taiwanese. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 27(7). 915–929. 45 indexed citations
20.
Lin, Chiu‐Chu. (2005). Development and testing of the diabetes self -management instrument.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026