Ching-Hung Lin
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jen‐Chuen HsiehMing‐Kuei LuJeng‐Ren DuannYingying ChenJin‐Chern ChiouChon-Haw TsaiChun‐Ming ChenChih‐Hung Ko
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanAustraliaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Ching-Hung Lin
22 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 296
- General Decision Sciences 171
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
- Clinical Psychology 99
- Applied Psychology 90
Countries citing papers authored by Ching-Hung Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Ching-Hung Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching-Hung Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching-Hung Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ching-Hung Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching-Hung Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching-Hung Lin. The network helps show where Ching-Hung Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ching-Hung Lin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ching-Hung Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ching-Hung Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ching-Hung Lin. Ching-Hung Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | How experience and information influence choice behavior: A pilot fMRI study of the Iowa Gambling Task | 1 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | EEG-controlled Table Bike for Neurorehabilitation Based on Sensorimotor-rhythm BCI | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 72 | |
| 17 | 63 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 145 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About Ching-Hung Lin
Ching-Hung Lin is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (171 citations), Applied Psychology (90 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (296 citations). Ching-Hung Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Australia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Jen‐Chuen Hsieh, Ming‐Kuei Lu, Jeng‐Ren Duann, Yingying Chen, Jin‐Chern Chiou, Chon-Haw Tsai, Chun‐Ming Chen, Chih‐Hung Ko, Yu-Chen Kao and Hsien‐Yuan Lane. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.