Ching‐Feng Li

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
22 papers, 836 citations indexed

About

Ching‐Feng Li is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ching‐Feng Li has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 836 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 9 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Ching‐Feng Li's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). Ching‐Feng Li is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). Ching‐Feng Li collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, Czechia and Germany. Ching‐Feng Li's co-authors include David Zelený, Milan Chytrý, Chang‐Fu Hsieh, Chia‐Yen Hsu, Yuan‐Yao Li, Mark J. Costello, Buntarou Kusumoto, Simon Thorn, Robert K. Colwell and Chih‐Lin Wei and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

Ching‐Feng Li

22 papers receiving 816 citations

Hit Papers

Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ching‐Feng Li Taiwan 14 385 293 229 196 170 22 836
Jin Yao United States 14 381 1.0× 296 1.0× 152 0.7× 331 1.7× 92 0.5× 29 775
Naoki Kachi Japan 19 627 1.6× 284 1.0× 520 2.3× 185 0.9× 472 2.8× 83 1.2k
Jonah Piovia‐Scott United States 18 255 0.7× 373 1.3× 267 1.2× 340 1.7× 80 0.5× 49 950
Haruka Ohashi Japan 14 198 0.5× 380 1.3× 111 0.5× 230 1.2× 120 0.7× 33 851
William M. Cook United States 13 414 1.1× 291 1.0× 269 1.2× 231 1.2× 86 0.5× 23 737
Gillian L. Holloway Canada 16 311 0.8× 532 1.8× 229 1.0× 205 1.0× 28 0.2× 16 939
David A. Nipperess Australia 20 591 1.5× 531 1.8× 364 1.6× 284 1.4× 147 0.9× 38 1.4k
Noëlie Maurel Germany 14 535 1.4× 169 0.6× 521 2.3× 124 0.6× 389 2.3× 19 986
Juan F. Silva Venezuela 13 361 0.9× 155 0.5× 214 0.9× 188 1.0× 137 0.8× 20 667

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Feng Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Feng Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Feng Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Feng Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Feng Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Feng Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Feng Li. The network helps show where Ching‐Feng Li may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ching‐Feng Li

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ching‐Feng Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ching‐Feng Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ching‐Feng Li. Ching‐Feng Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chen, Chien‐Fan, et al.. (2022). Secondary succession on landslides in submontane forests of central Taiwan: Environmental drivers and restoration strategies. Applied Vegetation Science. 25(1). 3 indexed citations
3.
Li, Ching‐Feng, et al.. (2022). Influence of Different Addition Ratios of Fly Ash on Mechanical Properties of ADC10 Aluminum Matrix Composites. Metals. 12(4). 653–653. 7 indexed citations
4.
Chao, Anne, Yasuhiro Kubota, David Zelený, et al.. (2020). Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages. Ecological Research. 35(2). 292–314. 209 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Li, Ching‐Feng, et al.. (2020). Climate‐based approach for modeling the distribution of montane forest vegetation in Taiwan. Applied Vegetation Science. 23(2). 239–253. 10 indexed citations
6.
Chudomelová, Markéta, David Zelený, & Ching‐Feng Li. (2017). Contrasting patterns of fine-scale herb layer species composition in temperate forests. Acta Oecologica. 80. 24–31. 12 indexed citations
7.
Li, Ching‐Feng, et al.. (2017). Mapping the montane cloud forest of Taiwan using 12 year MODIS-derived ground fog frequency data. PLoS ONE. 12(2). e0172663–e0172663. 31 indexed citations
8.
Li, Ching‐Feng, David Zelený, Milan Chytrý, et al.. (2015). Chamaecyparis montane cloud forest in Taiwan: ecology and vegetation classification. Ecological Research. 30(5). 771–791. 24 indexed citations
9.
Thies, Boris, et al.. (2015). Frequency of Low Clouds in Taiwan Retrieved from MODIS Data and Its Relation to Cloud Forest Occurrence. Remote Sensing. 7(10). 12986–13004. 4 indexed citations
10.
Li, Ching‐Feng. (2014). Diversity of mountain forest vegetation in Taiwan. 1 indexed citations
11.
Pei, Kurtis Jai‐Chyi, Michael R. Vaughan, Ching‐Feng Li, et al.. (2014). Is the clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa extinct in Taiwan, and could it be reintroduced? An assessment of prey and habitat. Oryx. 49(2). 261–269. 16 indexed citations
12.
Li, Ching‐Feng, Chia‐Yen Hsu, & Yuan‐Yao Li. (2014). NH3 sensing properties of ZnO thin films prepared via sol–gel method. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 606. 27–31. 81 indexed citations
13.
Chang, Li‐Wan, David Zelený, Ching‐Feng Li, Shau‐Ting Chiu, & Chang‐Fu Hsieh. (2013). Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche‐ and dispersal‐based processes in community assembly. Ecology. 94(10). 2145–2151. 97 indexed citations
14.
Li, Ching‐Feng, Milan Chytrý, David Zelený, et al.. (2013). Classification of Taiwan forest vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science. 16(4). 698–719. 85 indexed citations
15.
Axmanová, Irena, Lubomír Tichý, Petra Hájková, et al.. (2012). Estimation of herbaceous biomass from species composition and cover. Applied Vegetation Science. 15(4). 580–589. 54 indexed citations
16.
Pei, Kurtis Jai‐Chyi, et al.. (2012). Niche Relationships of Carnivores in a Subtropical Primary Forest in Southern Taiwan. 21 indexed citations
17.
Axmanová, Irena, Milan Chytrý, David Zelený, et al.. (2011). The species richness–productivity relationship in the herb layer of European deciduous forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 21(6). 657–667. 49 indexed citations
18.
Axmanová, Irena, David Zelený, Ching‐Feng Li, & Milan Chytrý. (2011). Environmental factors influencing herb layer productivity in Central European oak forests: insights from soil and biomass analyses and a phytometer experiment. Plant and Soil. 342(1-2). 183–194. 29 indexed citations
19.
Chytrý, Milan, Jiří Danihelka, Irena Axmanová, et al.. (2010). Floristic diversity of an eastern Mediterranean dwarf shrubland: the importance of soil pH. Journal of Vegetation Science. 21(6). 1125–1137. 30 indexed citations
20.
Zelený, David, Ching‐Feng Li, & Milan Chytrý. (2010). Pattern of local plant species richness along a gradient of landscape topographical heterogeneity: result of spatial mass effect or environmental shift?. Ecography. 33(3). 578–589. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026