Chi-Ling Fu

424 total citations
9 papers, 302 citations indexed

About

Chi-Ling Fu is a scholar working on Parasitology, Ecology and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Chi-Ling Fu has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 302 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Parasitology, 6 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Chi-Ling Fu's work include Parasites and Host Interactions (8 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (6 papers) and Amoebic Infections and Treatments (4 papers). Chi-Ling Fu is often cited by papers focused on Parasites and Host Interactions (8 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (6 papers) and Amoebic Infections and Treatments (4 papers). Chi-Ling Fu collaborates with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Chi-Ling Fu's co-authors include Michael H. Hsieh, Justin I. Odegaard, De’Broski R. Herbert, Olfat Hammam, Jared Honeycutt, Yueh‐Lun Lee, Bor‐Luen Chiang, Tyrrell A. Nelson, Debalina Ray and Shailja Patel and has published in prestigious journals such as Infection and Immunity, PLoS Pathogens and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

In The Last Decade

Chi-Ling Fu

9 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chi-Ling Fu United States 8 192 99 60 49 47 9 302
A. James M. Daveson Australia 11 205 1.1× 82 0.8× 95 1.6× 31 0.6× 110 2.3× 23 695
Laura J. Appleby United Kingdom 12 263 1.4× 93 0.9× 31 0.5× 88 1.8× 101 2.1× 17 412
Jia Shen China 10 191 1.0× 111 1.1× 26 0.4× 41 0.8× 45 1.0× 20 326
Luciën E. P. M. van der Vlugt Netherlands 11 264 1.4× 119 1.2× 76 1.3× 101 2.1× 280 6.0× 15 626
Kathrin Arndts Germany 10 181 0.9× 118 1.2× 157 2.6× 26 0.5× 65 1.4× 27 301
David Carey United States 9 200 1.0× 122 1.2× 57 0.9× 132 2.7× 43 0.9× 12 380
Amin Zakeri Denmark 10 91 0.5× 52 0.5× 44 0.7× 18 0.4× 125 2.7× 14 341
J. A. Lenzi Brazil 11 275 1.4× 104 1.1× 42 0.7× 102 2.1× 33 0.7× 16 346
Osamu Zaha Japan 9 247 1.3× 127 1.3× 48 0.8× 27 0.6× 103 2.2× 14 386
Tomer Bashi Israel 9 93 0.5× 19 0.2× 57 0.9× 35 0.7× 84 1.8× 10 309

Countries citing papers authored by Chi-Ling Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-Ling Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-Ling Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-Ling Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-Ling Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-Ling Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-Ling Fu. The network helps show where Chi-Ling Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chi-Ling Fu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chi-Ling Fu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chi-Ling Fu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chi-Ling Fu. Chi-Ling Fu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Shalaby‐Rana, Eglal, Austin G. Hester, Jared Honeycutt, et al.. (2021). Macroscopic and microscopic imaging modalities for diagnosis and monitoring of urogenital schistosomiasis. Advances in Parasitology. 112. 51–76. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mbanefo, Evaristus C., Shannon E. Karinshak, Mohammad Afzal Khan, et al.. (2020). IPSE, an abundant egg-secreted protein of the carcinogenic helminth Schistosoma haematobium, promotes proliferation of bladder cancer cells and angiogenesis. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 15(1). 63–63. 14 indexed citations
3.
Mbanefo, Evaristus C., Chi-Ling Fu, Loc Le, et al.. (2019). Interleukin-4 Signaling Plays a Major Role in Urogenital Schistosomiasis-Associated Bladder Pathogenesis. Infection and Immunity. 88(3). 11 indexed citations
4.
Honeycutt, Jared, Olfat Hammam, Chi-Ling Fu, & Michael H. Hsieh. (2014). Controversies and challenges in research on urogenital schistosomiasis-associated bladder cancer. Trends in Parasitology. 30(7). 324–332. 55 indexed citations
5.
Richardson, Monica L., Chi-Ling Fu, Luke F. Pennington, et al.. (2014). A New Mouse Model for Female Genital Schistosomiasis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 8(5). e2825–e2825. 14 indexed citations
6.
Fu, Chi-Ling, et al.. (2014). Helminth-Induced Interleukin-4 Abrogates Invariant Natural Killer T Cell Activation-Associated Clearance of Bacterial Infection. Infection and Immunity. 82(5). 2087–2097. 29 indexed citations
7.
Fu, Chi-Ling, Justin I. Odegaard, De’Broski R. Herbert, & Michael H. Hsieh. (2012). A Novel Mouse Model of Schistosoma haematobium Egg-Induced Immunopathology. PLoS Pathogens. 8(3). e1002605–e1002605. 85 indexed citations
8.
Ray, Debalina, Tyrrell A. Nelson, Chi-Ling Fu, et al.. (2012). Transcriptional Profiling of the Bladder in Urogenital Schistosomiasis Reveals Pathways of Inflammatory Fibrosis and Urothelial Compromise. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 6(11). e1912–e1912. 39 indexed citations
9.
Fu, Chi-Ling, et al.. (2006). Effects of overexpression of IL-10, IL-12, TGF-β and IL-4 on allergen induced change in bronchial responsiveness. Respiratory Research. 7(1). 72–72. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026