Chikara Egami

723 citations
64 papers · 536 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Chikara Egami

57 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

Chikara Egami
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 203
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 231
  • Biophysics 42
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 39
  • Biomedical Engineering 244
Replace Masaaki Tsuchimori with:
Masaaki Tsuchimori Japan
Yang Pang United States
G. Zoriniants United Kingdom
David C. Coffey United States
Naomichi Okamoto Japan
Stephen C. Weibel United States
Werner Hickel Germany
Pompilio Del Carro Italy
Yu‐Chueh Hung Taiwan
Tony C. Kowalczyk United States
Chikara Egami relative to Masaaki Tsuchimori Japan Masaaki Tsuchimori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Masaaki Tsuchimori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chikara Egami

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chikara Egami's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chikara Egami with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chikara Egami more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chikara Egami

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chikara Egami. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chikara Egami. The network helps show where Chikara Egami may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chikara Egami, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chikara Egami Line = papers co-authored together Chikara Egami links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199937
2 199737
3 200435
4 199834
5 200031
6 199924
7 199023
8 199622
9 199920
10 200018
11 199217
12 199915
13 199715
14 200514
15 199813
16 200211
17 199710
18 200010
19 200210
20 20009

About Chikara Egami

Chikara Egami is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biophysics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (27 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (19 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (15 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (13 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (13 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (11 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (11 papers) and Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (203 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (231 citations), Biophysics (42 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (39 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (244 citations). Chikara Egami has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Okihiro Sugihara, Osamu Watanabe, Masaaki Tsuchimori, H. Fujimura, Naoya Okamoto, Naomichi Okamoto, Yoshimasa Kawata, Kazuo Nakagawa, Yasushi Kawata and Makoto Nakanishi. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Optics Letters, Optics Communications and Optical Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact