Chengxin Fu

4.6k total citations
136 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Chengxin Fu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Chengxin Fu has authored 136 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Molecular Biology, 58 papers in Plant Science and 53 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Chengxin Fu's work include Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (43 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (40 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (32 papers). Chengxin Fu is often cited by papers focused on Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (43 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (40 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (32 papers). Chengxin Fu collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Austria. Chengxin Fu's co-authors include Yingxiong Qiu, Kenneth M. Cameron, Pan Li, Hans Peter Comes, Yunpeng Zhao, Мarcus A. Koch, Pamela S. Soltis, Joongku Lee, Luxian Liu and Wei Gong and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Chengxin Fu

134 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chengxin Fu China 32 1.7k 1.4k 1.1k 903 337 136 3.3k
Junbo Yang China 38 2.5k 1.4× 1.5k 1.1× 1.5k 1.3× 544 0.6× 528 1.6× 144 3.8k
Maarten J. M. Christenhusz United Kingdom 23 1.5k 0.8× 1.7k 1.2× 2.5k 2.3× 268 0.3× 255 0.8× 156 4.0k
Dirk C. Albach Germany 34 2.5k 1.4× 2.3k 1.7× 2.9k 2.6× 588 0.7× 221 0.7× 140 4.6k
R. R. Mill United Kingdom 18 967 0.6× 1.2k 0.9× 1.5k 1.4× 291 0.3× 198 0.6× 79 2.5k
Gwilym P. Lewis United Kingdom 33 1.2k 0.7× 1.5k 1.1× 2.2k 2.0× 301 0.3× 57 0.2× 192 3.5k
Bao‐Rong Lu China 41 2.1k 1.2× 4.9k 3.6× 908 0.8× 2.1k 2.3× 103 0.3× 165 5.7k
Miguel Pedro Guerra Brazil 36 3.3k 1.9× 3.3k 2.4× 971 0.9× 250 0.3× 276 0.8× 255 4.6k
Michael Nee United States 21 599 0.3× 1.5k 1.1× 880 0.8× 375 0.4× 189 0.6× 69 2.4k
Jan Bocianowski Poland 29 787 0.5× 3.1k 2.2× 438 0.4× 650 0.7× 325 1.0× 425 3.8k
Gen‐ichiro Arimura Japan 39 1.8k 1.0× 3.5k 2.5× 1.4k 1.3× 194 0.2× 102 0.3× 87 5.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Chengxin Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chengxin Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chengxin Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chengxin Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chengxin Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chengxin Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chengxin Fu. The network helps show where Chengxin Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chengxin Fu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chengxin Fu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chengxin Fu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chengxin Fu. Chengxin Fu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yang, Teng, Leho Tedersoo, Pamela S. Soltis, et al.. (2022). Plant and fungal species interactions differ between aboveground and belowground habitats in mountain forests of eastern China. Science China Life Sciences. 66(5). 1134–1150. 11 indexed citations
2.
Li, Junmin, et al.. (2021). Comparative physiology and transcriptome analysis reveals the regulatory mechanism of genome duplication enhancing cold resistance in Fragaria nilgerrensis. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 188. 104509–104509. 10 indexed citations
3.
Zhu, Shanshan, Jun Chen, Jing Zhao, et al.. (2020). Genomic insights on the contribution of balancing selection and local adaptation to the long‐term survival of a widespread living fossil tree, Cercidiphyllum japonicum. New Phytologist. 228(5). 1674–1689. 36 indexed citations
4.
Xu, Wuqin, Chuan Chen, Pan Li, et al.. (2018). Comparative genomics of figworts (Scrophularia, Scrophulariaceae), with implications for the evolution of Scrophularia and Lamiales. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 57(1). 55–65. 27 indexed citations
5.
Wang, Ruihong, et al.. (2018). A new species of Scrophularia (Scrophulariaceae) from Hubei, China. Phytotaxa. 350(1). 5 indexed citations
6.
Gao, Song, Luxi Chen, Yao‐Bin Song, et al.. (2017). Effects of ploidy level and haplotype on variation of photosynthetic traits: Novel evidence from two Fragaria species. PLoS ONE. 12(6). e0179899–e0179899. 21 indexed citations
8.
Wang, Ruihong, et al.. (2014). Development of microsatellite loci in Scrophularia incisa (Scrophulariaceae) and cross‐amplification in congeneric species. Applications in Plant Sciences. 2(2). 3 indexed citations
10.
Lu, Yin, et al.. (2011). Biological activities of extracts from a naturally wild kiwifruit, Actinidia macrosperma. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(10). 2231–2234. 5 indexed citations
11.
Fu, Chengxin, et al.. (2011). High-frequency shoot regeneration of nodal explants from Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg: A valuable medicinal plant. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 10(57). 12177–12181. 7 indexed citations
12.
Yang, Shuting, Chuan Chen, Yunpeng Zhao, et al.. (2010). Association between Chemical and Genetic Variation of Wild and Cultivated Populations ofScrophularia ningpoensisHemsl.. Planta Medica. 77(8). 865–871. 14 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Aili, Yeye Chen, Guangchun Chen, Joongku Lee, & Chengxin Fu. (2008). Relationships and Hybridization among Smilax china and Its Affinities: Evidence from Allozyme Data. Biochemical Genetics. 46(5-6). 281–292. 2 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Pengjun, Chengxin Fu, Yun Zhou, et al.. (2008). Trade-offs between constitutive and induced resistance in wild crucifers shown by a natural, but not an artificial, elicitor. Oecologia. 157(1). 83–92. 30 indexed citations
16.
Zhao, Yunpeng, et al.. (2007). Authentication of Actinidia macrosperma Using PCR-RFLP Based on trnK Sequences. Botanical studies. 48(3). 239–242. 8 indexed citations
17.
Qiu, Yingxiong, Xinwen Zhou, Chengxin Fu, & Yuk Sing Gilbert Chan. (2005). A preliminary study of genetic variation in the endangered, Chinese endemic species Dysosma versipellis (Berberidaceae). PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University). 22 indexed citations
18.
Zhang, Hongyin, et al.. (2004). Effects of Cryptococcus laurentii (Kufferath) Skinner in combination with sodium bicarbonate on biocontrol of postharvest green mold decay of citrus fruit. Zhōngyāng yánjiūyuàn zhíwùxué huikān/Zhōngyāng yánjiūyuàn zhíwùxué huikān. 45(2). 159–164. 22 indexed citations
19.
Qiu, Yingxiong, Chengxin Fu, & Feijie Wu. (2003). [Analysis of population genetic structure and molecular identification of Changium smyrnioides and Chuanminshen violaceum with ISSR marker].. PubMed. 28(7). 598–603. 9 indexed citations
20.
Fu, Chengxin, Yingxiong Qiu, & Hanghui Kong. (2003). RAPD analysis for genetic diversity in Changium smyrnioides (Apiaceae), an endangered plant1. Zhōngyāng yánjiūyuàn zhíwùxué huikān/Zhōngyāng yánjiūyuàn zhíwùxué huikān. 44(1). 13–18. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026