Cheng‐Ping Chang

73 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Cheng‐Ping Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Chemical Health and Safety 12
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 189
  • Environmental Engineering 131
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 61
  • Library and Information Sciences 9
Replace William B. Bunn with:
William B. Bunn United States
Ash Genaidy United States
Sung‐Kwon Hong South Korea
Claudiu T. Lungu United States
Erik Uhde Germany
Laura MacCalman United Kingdom
Xiaoyu Liu China
MARC REISCH United States
Angela Bielefeldt United States
Alain Michel France
Cheng‐Ping Chang relative to William B. Bunn United States William B. Bunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
William B. Bunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng‐Ping Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng‐Ping Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng‐Ping Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng‐Ping Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng‐Ping Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng‐Ping Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng‐Ping Chang. The network helps show where Cheng‐Ping Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheng‐Ping Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng‐Ping Chang Line = papers co-authored together Cheng‐Ping Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200794
2 201685
3 201165
4 200452
5 201849
6 200738
7 200434
8 201133
9 201032
10 201731
11 201029
12 200627
13 200627
14 200926
15 201825
16 201124
17 201023
18 200622
19 201318
20 201616

About Cheng‐Ping Chang

Cheng‐Ping Chang is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Environmental Engineering, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Air Quality and Health Impacts (9 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (8 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (7 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (6 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (5 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Occupational exposure and asthma (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (12 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (189 citations), Environmental Engineering (131 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (61 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (9 citations). Cheng‐Ping Chang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Slovenia and China. Frequent co-authors include Chih-Chieh Chen, Chane-Yu Lai, Sheng-Hsiu Huang, Chuen‐Jinn Tsai, Chun-Wan Chen, Chih-Ta Wang, Yung Liou, Yuan‐Ron Ma, Ranjit A. Patil and Rupesh S. Devan. Their work appears in journals such as Quality & Quantity, Health Physics, Journal of Aerosol Science, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Aerosol and Air Quality Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact