Chengen Ma

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 868 citations indexed

About

Chengen Ma is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Chengen Ma has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 868 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Soil Science and 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Chengen Ma's work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers). Chengen Ma is often cited by papers focused on Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers). Chengen Ma collaborates with scholars based in China, Sweden and Australia. Chengen Ma's co-authors include Dali Guo, Michael McCormack, Guigang Lin, Deliang Kong, Hui Zeng, Le Li, Xiaoyong Chen, Qian Zhang, Christopher W. Fernandez and Peter B. Reich and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, New Phytologist and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Chengen Ma

8 papers receiving 859 citations

Hit Papers

Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation acr... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chengen Ma China 6 618 396 335 190 152 8 868
Christopher J. Sweeney United Kingdom 6 565 0.9× 275 0.7× 286 0.9× 123 0.6× 94 0.6× 10 862
Xing Wei China 7 572 0.9× 291 0.7× 223 0.7× 160 0.8× 69 0.5× 12 740
Joanna Mucha Poland 14 456 0.7× 145 0.4× 211 0.6× 135 0.7× 120 0.8× 53 652
Annemiek E. Smit‐Tiekstra Netherlands 12 581 0.9× 285 0.7× 449 1.3× 110 0.6× 51 0.3× 13 927
Amane Hidaka Japan 8 398 0.6× 272 0.7× 240 0.7× 135 0.7× 69 0.5× 10 624
Jeremiah R. Pinto United States 18 504 0.8× 186 0.5× 601 1.8× 196 1.0× 28 0.2× 44 858
Pascale Maillard France 19 619 1.0× 212 0.5× 343 1.0× 623 3.3× 58 0.4× 50 1.1k
Ali M. Quoreshi Kuwait 17 491 0.8× 123 0.3× 233 0.7× 79 0.4× 120 0.8× 30 658
Catharina Meinen Germany 11 256 0.4× 197 0.5× 201 0.6× 115 0.6× 53 0.3× 16 533
Kevin R. Kosola United States 16 470 0.8× 116 0.3× 178 0.5× 170 0.9× 73 0.5× 33 709

Countries citing papers authored by Chengen Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chengen Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chengen Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chengen Ma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chengen Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chengen Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chengen Ma. The network helps show where Chengen Ma may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chengen Ma

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chengen Ma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chengen Ma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chengen Ma. Chengen Ma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Shao, Yuanhu, Tao Liu, Paul Kardol, et al.. (2023). Drivers of nematode diversity in forest soils across climatic zones. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 290(1994). 20230107–20230107. 12 indexed citations
2.
Lin, Guigang, Dali Guo, Liang Li, Chengen Ma, & De‐Hui Zeng. (2017). Contrasting effects of ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal tropical tree species on soil nitrogen cycling: the potential mechanisms and corresponding adaptive strategies. Oikos. 127(4). 518–530. 39 indexed citations
3.
McCormack, Michael, Dali Guo, Colleen M. Iversen, et al.. (2017). Building a better foundation: improving root‐trait measurements to understand and model plant and ecosystem processes. New Phytologist. 215(1). 27–37. 177 indexed citations
4.
Lin, Guigang, Michael McCormack, Chengen Ma, & Dali Guo. (2016). Similar below‐ground carbon cycling dynamics but contrasting modes of nitrogen cycling between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal forests. New Phytologist. 213(3). 1440–1451. 225 indexed citations
5.
Ma, Chengen, et al.. (2014). Stomatal characteristics of ferns and angiosperms and their responses to changing light intensity at different habitats. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 38(8). 868–877. 5 indexed citations
6.
Kong, Deliang & Chengen Ma. (2014). Acquisition of ephemeral module in roots: a new view and test. Scientific Reports. 4(1). 5078–5078. 12 indexed citations
7.
Kong, Deliang, Chengen Ma, Qian Zhang, et al.. (2014). Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytologist. 203(3). 863–872. 395 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Ma, Chengen, et al.. (2013). Root growth into litter layer and its impact on litter decomposition: a review. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 36(11). 1197–1204. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026