Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Chaudhry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chaudhry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chaudhry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chaudhry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chaudhry. The network helps show where Chaudhry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chaudhry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chaudhry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chaudhry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chaudhry. Chaudhry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Chaudhry, et al.. (2015). Thermal-aware relocation of servers in green data centers. 16(2). 119–134.9 indexed citations
2.
Dyck, P. James B., John C. Kincaid, Janice F. Wiesman, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of modifications of nis+7 score in oligonucleotide trials in ttr fap. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. 20(2). 132–133.1 indexed citations
Chaudhry, et al.. (2011). Comparative Study of Energy Quantization Approaches in Nanoscale MOSFETs. 9(1). 51–57.1 indexed citations
6.
Chaudhry, et al.. (2010). Nanoscale strained-Si MOSFET physics and modeling approaches： a review. 半导体学报：英文版. 19–23.1 indexed citations
7.
Chaudhry, et al.. (2010). Analytical Modeling of Source-to-Drain Tunneling in Nanoscale Silicon MOSFET. 8(4). 346–350.3 indexed citations
8.
Chaudhry. (2009). Camel rearing in Cholistan desert of Pakistan.4 indexed citations
9.
Chaudhry, et al.. (2008). Sources of resistance from lentil international Fusarium wilt nursery 2006-7. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology.5 indexed citations
10.
Anwar, Anwar, et al.. (2007). Spatially Adaptive Image Restoration Using Fuzzy Punctual Kriging. 22(4). 580–589.1 indexed citations
11.
Chaudhry, et al.. (2003). DYSLIPIDEMIAS IN TYPE II DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF LAHORE, PAKISTAN. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 19(4). 283–286.18 indexed citations
12.
Jabeen, Farhat, Nina Ahmad, Chaudhry, & I. Javed. (1998). Epidemiology and treatment of sarcoptic mange in buffalo calves around Lahore [Pakistan].3 indexed citations
13.
Chaudhry, et al.. (1998). Radio-sensitivity and mutability in lentil (Lens culinars Medik.) as related to seed size. Journal of genetics & breeding.1 indexed citations
Chaudhry, et al.. (1989). Gene action controlling yield and some of its components in spring wheat.3 indexed citations
16.
Chaudhry, et al.. (1988). Differences in Productive and Reproductive Performances of Nili-Ravi Buffalo Heifers Due to Altered Plane of Nutrition. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 5(2). 87–93.5 indexed citations
17.
Hasany, S. M., et al.. (1978). Neutron activation analysis of trace elements in IAEA reference materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.