Chase Meyer

410 total citations
21 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Chase Meyer is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Chase Meyer has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 9 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Chase Meyer's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). Chase Meyer is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). Chase Meyer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Chase Meyer's co-authors include Matt Vassar, Cole Wayant, Jared Scott, Jake X. Checketts, Erick H. Turner, Mousumi Som, Timo Siepmann, Faisal S. Ali, Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao Pu and Caleb Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and European Urology.

In The Last Decade

Chase Meyer

20 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chase Meyer United States 10 80 78 77 67 63 21 263
Nikko Gimpaya Canada 9 14 0.2× 99 1.3× 44 0.6× 64 1.0× 60 1.0× 41 265
Ramey L Wilson United States 8 39 0.5× 67 0.9× 18 0.2× 88 1.3× 4 0.1× 34 258
Selma Mourad Netherlands 13 36 0.5× 29 0.4× 23 0.3× 220 3.3× 4 0.1× 18 479
Katia Audisio United States 12 24 0.3× 204 2.6× 13 0.2× 48 0.7× 4 0.1× 35 388
John C. Dickinson United States 8 19 0.2× 21 0.3× 53 0.7× 85 1.3× 5 0.1× 15 361
Marieke G.M. Weernink Netherlands 10 7 0.1× 30 0.4× 95 1.2× 24 0.4× 19 0.3× 13 278
Randall L. Webb United States 8 15 0.2× 257 3.3× 25 0.3× 80 1.2× 6 0.1× 9 353
SB Bavdekar India 9 8 0.1× 20 0.3× 30 0.4× 64 1.0× 6 0.1× 30 198
S. Sänger Germany 7 10 0.1× 97 1.2× 48 0.6× 93 1.4× 5 0.1× 19 346
Petra Díaz del Campo Spain 7 28 0.3× 10 0.1× 40 0.5× 115 1.7× 4 0.1× 15 268

Countries citing papers authored by Chase Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chase Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chase Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chase Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chase Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chase Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chase Meyer. The network helps show where Chase Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chase Meyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chase Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chase Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chase Meyer. Chase Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2021). An analysis of the rates of discontinuation and non-publication of colorectal cancer clinical trials. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 36(11). 2529–2532. 8 indexed citations
2.
Pu, Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao, Jacqueline Thompson, Anton Lord, et al.. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of narrow‐band imaging endoscopy with targeted biopsies compared with standard endoscopy with random biopsies in patients with Barrett's esophagus: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 36(10). 2659–2671. 14 indexed citations
3.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2020). Are randomized controlled trials being conducted with the right justification?. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 13(3). 181–182. 15 indexed citations
4.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2019). The fragility index applied to liver-related trials. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 38(5). 456–459. 2 indexed citations
5.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2019). An analysis of randomized controlled trials underpinning ST-elevation myocardial infarction management guidelines. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 37(12). 2229–2238. 2 indexed citations
6.
Chapman, Chris, et al.. (2019). Analysis of completeness of reporting utilizing the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare Statement in gastroenterology clinical practice guidelines. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 17(3). 173–178. 1 indexed citations
7.
Wayant, Cole, et al.. (2019). The Fragility Index in a Cohort of HIV/AIDS Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(7). 1236–1243. 15 indexed citations
8.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2019). Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 18(1). 116–124. 13 indexed citations
9.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2019). The fragility of randomized trial outcomes underlying management of dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infections. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 18(1). 125–137. 4 indexed citations
10.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2018). Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines. PLoS ONE. 13(10). e0204720–e0204720. 18 indexed citations
11.
12.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2018). Assessing quality of randomized trials supporting guidelines for laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery. Journal of Surgical Research. 224. 233–239. 9 indexed citations
13.
Checketts, Jake X., et al.. (2018). The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 100(12). e85–e85. 62 indexed citations
14.
Wayant, Cole, et al.. (2018). Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Authors of Urology Clinical Practice Guidelines. European Urology. 74(3). 348–354. 30 indexed citations
15.
Wayant, Cole, et al.. (2018). Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Oncologist Authors of Reports of Clinical Drug Trials. JAMA Oncology. 4(10). 1426–1426. 42 indexed citations
16.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (2017). Suicide risk assessment in the emergency department: Are there any tools in the pipeline?. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 36(4). 630–636. 11 indexed citations
17.
Gaudet, Daniel, Julie Méthot, Diane Brisson, et al.. (2016). A Long-Term (up to 6 years) Retrospective Analysis of Gene Therapy with Alipogene Tiparvovec and its Effect on Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency (LPLD)-Induced Pancreatitis.. Human Gene Therapy. 2 indexed citations
18.
Schröder, A., Chase Meyer, Gisa Ellrichmann, et al.. (2009). Plasmapherese in der Eskalationstherapie der Multiplen Sklerose: Verlaufsbeobachtung an 35 Patienten. Aktuelle Neurologie. 36(3). 105–110. 8 indexed citations
19.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (1983). [Surgical treatment of acute necrotizing hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Analysis and prospective deductions on 58 cases].. PubMed. 120(11). 595–601. 1 indexed citations
20.
Meyer, Chase, et al.. (1980). [Acute pancreatitis - indications, choice of management and results of surgical treatment].. PubMed. 51(6). 371–5. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026