Charles Zammit

536 total citations
9 papers, 229 citations indexed

About

Charles Zammit is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Zammit has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 229 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Oncology, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Charles Zammit's work include Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper). Charles Zammit is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper). Charles Zammit collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Australia. Charles Zammit's co-authors include Valerie Jenkins, Helena Harder, David B. Lindenmayer, Simon Attwood, Geoff Kay, Anna Good, Richard Barnard, Jennifer J. Gomm, R. Charles Coombes and Caroline L. Johnston and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer Research and The Journal of Pathology.

In The Last Decade

Charles Zammit

7 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Charles Zammit

ONCOL

MB

PRM

GHP

GPC

Suzanne Tucker United States

Robert Zielinski Australia

Meredith Wilson United States

Muriel Viala France

Carolyn M. Matthews United States

Valerie Poynor United States

Monica Prasad Hayes United States

Lisa M. Fitzgerald United States

Jenneke Christiaens Belgium

Moore Jw United States

Suzanne Tucker United States

Charles Zammit

22 ×0.4

ONCOL

42 ×0.9

MB

48 ×1.3

PRM

51 ×1.6

GHP

23 ×0.8

GPC

Citations per year, relative to Charles Zammit Charles Zammit (= 1×) peers Suzanne Tucker

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Zammit

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Zammit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Zammit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Zammit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Zammit

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Zammit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Zammit. The network helps show where Charles Zammit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Zammit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Zammit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Zammit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Zammit. Charles Zammit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Jenkins, Valerie, May Teoh, David Bloomfield, et al.. (2023). Patients’ views and experiences on the supported self-management/patient-initiated follow up pathway for breast cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 31(11). 658–658.

2.

Harder, Helena, et al.. (2017). A user-centred approach to developing bWell, a mobile app for arm and shoulder exercises after breast cancer treatment. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 11(6). 732–742. 56 indexed citations

3.

Zammit, Charles, et al.. (2017). A joint geriatric oncology clinic for the management of elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer: The Brighton experience. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 43(5). S22–S22.

4.

Jenkins, Valerie, Ryan S. Thwaites, Mara Cercignani, et al.. (2016). A feasibility study exploring the role of pre-operative assessment when examining the mechanism of ‘chemo-brain’ in breast cancer patients. SpringerPlus. 5(1). 390–390. 24 indexed citations

5.

Schmid, Peter, Sarah E. Pinder, Duncan Wheatley, et al.. (2015). Abstract S2-03: Preoperative window of opportunity study of the PI3K inhibitor pictilisib (GDC-0941) plus anastrozole vs anastrozole alone in patients with ER+, HER2-negative operable breast cancer (OPPORTUNE study). Cancer Research. 75(9_Supplement). S2–3. 4 indexed citations

6.

Harder, Helena, et al.. (2015). Post-operative exercises after breast cancer surgery: Results of a RCT evaluating standard care versus standard care plus additional yoga exercise. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 7(3). 202–210. 21 indexed citations

7.

Wale, Anita, Kenneth A. Miles, Barnaby Edward Young, et al.. (2013). Combined 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintigraphy and fine-needle aspiration cytology offers an accurate and potentially cost-effective investigative strategy for the assessment of solitary or dominant thyroid nodules. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 41(1). 105–115. 25 indexed citations

8.

Lindenmayer, David B., Charles Zammit, Simon Attwood, et al.. (2012). A Novel and Cost-Effective Monitoring Approach for Outcomes in an Australian Biodiversity Conservation Incentive Program. PLoS ONE. 7(12). e50872–e50872. 51 indexed citations

9.

Zammit, Charles, Richard Barnard, Jennifer J. Gomm, et al.. (2001). Altered intracellular localization of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in human breast cancer. The Journal of Pathology. 194(1). 27–34. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact