Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Werner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Werner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Werner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Werner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Werner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Werner. The network helps show where Charles Werner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Werner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Werner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Werner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Werner. Charles Werner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Frey, Othmar, Charles Werner, Rafael Caduff, & Andreas Wiesmann. (2016). A time series of SAR tomographic profiles of a snowpack. 1–5.7 indexed citations
9.
Lemmetyinen, Juha, Anna Kontu, Jouni Pulliainen, et al.. (2016). Nordic Snow Radar Experiment. Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems. 5(2). 403–415.42 indexed citations
Baker, B., Ryan Cassotto, M. A. Fahnestock, Charles Werner, & M. S. Boettcher. (2015). Measurement of Creep on the Calaveras Fault at Coyote Dam using Terrestrial Radar Interferometry (TRI).. 2015 AGU Fall Meeting. 2015.1 indexed citations
12.
Frey, Othmar, et al.. (2014). Combining SAR tomography and a PSI approach for high-resolution 3-D imaging of an urban area. elib (German Aerospace Center).10 indexed citations
13.
Wegmüller, U., Maurizio Santoro, & Charles Werner. (2013). Multi-Temporal SAR Data Filtering For Land Applications. 722. 42.4 indexed citations
Werner, Charles, U. Wegmüller, & Tazio Strozzi. (2012). Deformation Time-Series of the Lost-Hills Oil Field using a Multi-Baseline Interferometric SAR Inversion Algorithm with Finite Difference Smoothing Constraints. AGUFM. 2012.11 indexed citations
Schmullius, C., Alexandre Bouvet, Oliver Cartus, et al.. (2006). MID-TERM STATUS OF THE FOREST DRAGON PROJECT. ESASP. 611.1 indexed citations
18.
Strozzi, Tazio, Charles Werner, U. Wegmüller, & Andreas Wiesmann. (2005). Monitoring Land Subsidence in Mexico City with Envisat ASAR Interferometry. 572.2 indexed citations
19.
Strozzi, Tazio, et al.. (2005). Analysis of the Displacement along a Funicular with Large Baseline Interferograms on Point Targets. 572.1 indexed citations
20.
Held, D. N., Charles Werner, & S. D. Wall. (1983). The absolute amplitude calibration of the SEASAT synthetic aperture radar - An intercomparison with other L-band radar systems.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.