Charles W. Chase

52 total papers · 492 total citations
26 papers, 270 citations indexed

About

Charles W. Chase is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles W. Chase has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 270 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Management Information Systems, 10 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 1 paper in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Charles W. Chase's work include Big Data and Business Intelligence (12 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (9 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (2 papers). Charles W. Chase is often cited by papers focused on Big Data and Business Intelligence (12 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (9 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (2 papers). Charles W. Chase collaborates with scholars based in Japan. Charles W. Chase's co-authors include Kenneth B. Kahn, Matthew Schnaderbeck, Xiaojie Zhu, Bryan M. Lewis, Gordon Wilkie, Francis G. Fang, J.L. Collins, J.T. Bell, B.Z. Egan and Kevin K. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Synlett, Journal of food distribution research and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

Charles W. Chase

24 papers receiving 253 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Charles W. Chase 112 90 32 29 29 26 270
Diane Ahrens 109 1.0× 43 0.5× 26 0.8× 48 1.7× 35 1.2× 20 297
Tong Li 121 1.1× 33 0.4× 80 2.5× 73 2.5× 21 0.7× 32 315
Adam N. Elmachtoub 70 0.6× 83 0.9× 41 1.3× 81 2.8× 24 0.8× 29 276
Patrick Brandtner 56 0.5× 65 0.7× 36 1.1× 67 2.3× 20 0.7× 33 264
Mohammad Reza Mehregan 126 1.1× 44 0.5× 30 0.9× 18 0.6× 37 1.3× 36 324
Jingru Wang 88 0.8× 101 1.1× 14 0.4× 40 1.4× 23 0.8× 29 318
Cheng Wang 39 0.3× 22 0.2× 59 1.8× 8 0.3× 21 0.7× 27 312
Kejia Hu 58 0.5× 51 0.6× 31 1.0× 52 1.8× 25 0.9× 36 306
Burcu Adıgüzel Mercangöz 74 0.7× 83 0.9× 49 1.5× 28 1.0× 20 0.7× 12 266
Gaizka Garechana 31 0.3× 39 0.4× 36 1.1× 15 0.5× 19 0.7× 23 308

Countries citing papers authored by Charles W. Chase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles W. Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles W. Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles W. Chase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles W. Chase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles W. Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles W. Chase. The network helps show where Charles W. Chase may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles W. Chase

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles W. Chase. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles W. Chase based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles W. Chase. Charles W. Chase is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026